Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (195009)	7/19/2004 6:08:44 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1575611

If the media is so liberal, why did they give Bush a free ride for three years? They have not done so. Yes, they did.....right up until last fall. Only then did they begin to question the wisdom of going to Iraq. It was only the Brit. and Canadian press that were skeptical from the get go. Had the American press not rolled over so easily we might not be in Iraq right now. In fact, the NY Times apologized for being so trusting of Mr. Bush's rationale for going to war: nytimes.com As for other national matters, the American press believed it was patriotic not to be too critical of the president no matter the problem or the issue. Such a sack of $h*t......they undercut the first amendment and belied the notion that we have a free press. ted