Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: redfish who wrote (51405)	7/20/2004 11:01:32 AM
From: Suma	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

Thanks.What is the best article to read to get to the truth.. Do you have a link. Thank you.

To: redfish who wrote (51405)	7/21/2004 4:07:35 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

<font color=blue>"Suma if you read the article carefully, Berger didn't remove any documents from the room, each and every document is still there."<font color=black> Have you made a public retraction of this baseless assertion yet? No need to reply. I checked. You didn't retract it. Do you think any laws were violated by the former NSA to Prez Clinton (FWIW NSA stands for National Security Adviser)? Berger, by the way, should know specifically which laws cover the removal of the most highly classified documents, as well as the laws covering any personal notes taken from those same documents. And he also knows which laws cover the unauthorized destruction of "codeword," documents, the government's highest level of document security. He & his attorney said Berger knowingly removed the documents. Weren't Berger & Joe Wilson highly touted Foreign Policy advisors for the Kerry campaign until this week, uh, like when they suddenly resigned? And to listen to you folks, it's the Bush Admin with the crooks & liars. Go figure.