Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (141010)	7/20/2004 2:03:34 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You're weird, too. Having US troops on Iran's borders isn't THE reason for invading Iraq. There was no ONE reason for invading Iraq. Many reasons. All of them added up convinced some, not others, at the time. Some haven't withstood the test of time, some have. This is normal. If you study the history of wars, there is never ONE reason for any war. If you don't believe me, try talking about the reasons for the Civil War with any Civil War history buff. Put a Union supporter and a Confederacy supporter in the same room, shake well, and stand back.