SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (55239)7/20/2004 11:38:29 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793927
 
You used the word "stole." We don't know that anything was stolen. It could have been borrowed. Why would it have been borrowed.

Want to revise that? You know that it was illegal to take anything out of that room, including notes. By definition, it was theft.



To: Lane3 who wrote (55239)7/20/2004 11:49:17 AM
From: unclewest  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793927
 
You used the word "stole." We don't know that anything was stolen. It could have been borrowed.

Sure, he borrowed the documents. Sure sure sure.

He borrowed them and then hid them in his pants, his jacket and his briefcase.

If you or I did that we would be called a thief.

Go to a store and try borrowing that way and then call it inadvertent. The cops will laugh as you are being fingerprinted after they arrest you for stealing.

The procedures to safeguard secure documents are briefed to everyone with a security clearance at least once a year. Surely the former National Security Advisor knew the appropriate way to get further access to the data. Stuffing pockets is how a thief works.

I understand the need to get to the bottom of this. But the investigation will have to get beyond Berger to determine the details. Locking him up immediately, makes it more difficult for him to fabricate another cover-up or bs story.



To: Lane3 who wrote (55239)7/20/2004 1:18:27 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793927
 
"It could have been borrowed" ~~~ Karen, these papers weren't "borrowed".... Have you ever been in the National Archives to do any type of research??? These papers are OUR National papers...and one doesn't just "borrow" or steal from the NA.... It is heavily guarded, and while I can't know for sure, I would assume, there are cameras in the reading rooms as well. I know for sure they are there when one comes in the front doors...

There is NO way that Berger could have just "borrowed" anything from the NA without knowing it was illegal....NO WAY.