Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (55313)	7/20/2004 6:38:49 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793931

I'm going to have to get off SI and go find out what's been reported, I guess. Stay here and read it all. All the "facts" are out for now. The drumbeat is just starting. This one's legs will be fed by the picture of Berger stuffing his pants. I will be watching the late show monologues tonight!

To: Lane3 who wrote (55313)	7/21/2004 12:55:59 AM
From: KLP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793931

There are many questions, Karen. Re: original or copy of an original....no difference, IF both are "sensitive, classified, or highly classified....[we have seen various articles saying all of those descriptive words.] If a document is a copy of the original, it still has all the words and markings of the original. Therefore, it is the same as the original. However, if he took the ORIGINALS as well as some copies of other things....well, then...we certainly do have a major problem. And so does Mr Berger. Hopefully, the Archives folks have documented each paper in each of the files.....the things I've looked at have been documented as to type of document in the file so there is a record if something is missing.