Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (141076)	7/20/2004 6:46:49 PM
From: Win Smith	Respond to of 281500

I'm glad you continue to believe, I wouldn't expect anything less. What that particular speech of W's s has to do with the "evidence" of Iraq allegedly shipping WMDs to Syria is, however, somewhat obscure.

To: carranza2 who wrote (141076)	7/20/2004 10:30:21 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

Bush <"Some ask how urgent this danger is to America and the world. The danger is already significant, and it only grows worse with time. If we know Saddam Hussein has dangerous weapons today -- and we do -- does it make any sense for the world to wait to confront him as he grows even stronger and develops even more dangerous weapons?"> But Saddam did not have those weapons and he was not developing even more dangerous weapons, and there was no threat now and it was not growing worse. If it turns out as has been recently reported that the new interim President is a murderous thug who summarily executes people whose hands are tied behind their backs by shooting them in the head with a pistol, and if it turns out that the mass graves hold fewer Iraqi civilians than we ourselves have killed, then even our lauded "humanitarian" reasons are hollow illusions. You must ask yourself the following: 1) Would the American people have supported this war, and would Congress have given a green light to an invasion if the facts were known? If not, did the American people and Congress mistakenly support this war because they did not know the facts? 2) Would Americans and Congress support this war if it was being proposed today and if we knew the facts? If there would be no support for such a war, why was the war "the right thing to do"? 3) Were we wrong?