SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (36574)7/20/2004 9:17:53 PM
From: redfishRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Personally I do not want us to succeed in Iraq. The cost in terms of lives and resources would be vast, and it would take a decade at the very least.

In the meantime Al Qaeda et. al would be out there gunning for us. Thanks, but no thanks.

I prefer Nader's position on Iraq, which is the only sensible one.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (36574)7/20/2004 9:42:11 PM
From: ChinuSFORead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
why do they embrace Michael Moore who has stated unequivocally he wants America to fail in Iraq?

Michael Moore has varying degree of suppport from the people starting with those who support him all the way to those who say he is OK. However his opponents oppose him in entireity. Ther are no varying degrees of disagreement. So Kerry is part of that rainbow of support for Moore, IMO.

I don't think we have intelligence agents.
We do have good intelligence agents. Under the current Administration they are demoralized especially after they were benignly persuaded to be a bad speller and put a "Q" instead of "N" in their report to the President.