Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: abstract who wrote (51600)	7/21/2004 11:40:39 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 89467

<font color=blue>"Fascinating to me how you incessantly attack someone by asking if they've "retracted their baseless assertion."" <font color=black> I was unaware that incessantly = one incident. I was also unaware that asking a legitimate question = a personal attack. <font color=blue> "97% of what you accuse me of is wrong." <font color=black> Time & time again I have shown that your opinion does not = factual reality - all the evidence is available on my thread....... Subject 54329 How you came up with your assertion that you are right 97% of the time without any evidence whatsoever is typical how you draw baseless conclusions in the face of overwhelming facts completely contrary to your opinions. <font color=blue> "BUT before you even make the accusation, you bar me from your thread so that I can't respond nor defend myself." <font color=black> All I did was respond to two posts I had yet to read from you (linked below). Note that both posts were completely "off topic" for my thread & one was laced with baseless personal attacks - something that my thread specifically states, <font color=red>"I'll have a very low tolerance for personal attacks."<font color=black> Also note that, despite repeated warnings, you were banned for repeatedly engaging in personal attacks & posting "off topic". In fact you rarely ever posted "on topic". Your last two posts were just more of the same old stuff that got you banned in the first place. <font color=blue> "If someone did the same to you you would surely call them Un-American or worse." <font color=black> When have I ever accused you or anyone on SI of being Un-American? Links please. <font color=blue> "I guess you won't retract a word because you are the consummate coward." <font color=black> I have nothing to retract. I also have nothing to fear or run from. I replied to your deceitful, misleading & dishonest post, with facts & credible evidence didn't I? That's where we differ abstract. I deal in reality, you know, the one that actually happens, not the one where you go back & revise history to fit your ideological POV? Your post - Message 20325637 My reply - Message 20330388 Your post - Message 20326048 My reply - siliconinvestor.com