SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BelowTheCrowd who wrote (178795)7/21/2004 3:54:30 PM
From: John Walliker  Respond to of 186894
 
Programming languages in 1968???

Don't forget FORTRAN for scientific programming - about as old as COBOL.

John



To: BelowTheCrowd who wrote (178795)7/21/2004 4:14:20 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Respond to of 186894
 
the 70s is when the RDBMS area got underway with R* from IBM. THe 70s although a fairly lackluster period economically were great for some areas of technology that manifested themselves into huge businesses by the 90s.



To: BelowTheCrowd who wrote (178795)7/22/2004 3:23:57 AM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Michael, RE: "What's your definition of "overdue?"

When you see someone standing around for long periods of time, followed by hearing a few dozen choice curses. Repeatedly too. And when the status of what's wrong exceeds the cost to replace.

Whether it's a replacement or upgrade, depends upon the department (accounting gets replacements, engineering gets upgrades.)

Sounds like you are focused on large to mid-size firms. I think the smaller firms suffered austerity a bit more than the larger firms.

RE: "As I'm currently looking for new projects, I'm in the unusual situation of being able to check out many companies."

Let us know what you see in terms of upgrade and replacement cycles.

RE: "Programming languages in 1968???"

I actually didn't know. Had this vision of assembly (ugh). But a higher level language makes sense.

Regards,
Amy J