Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (3727)	7/24/2004 4:20:00 PM
From: Thomas M.	Respond to of 35834

You claimed I said, "The fake documents were not the basis of the previous reporting by our allies". When did I make that verbatim claim? Are you aware that using quotation marks like that signify they are verbatim quotes? Here are the exact words you highlighted: fake documents — which were not the basis of the previous reporting by our allies I dropped the word "which" and a dash. I only changed the grammar to fit the discussion. Tom

To: Sully- who wrote (3727)	7/24/2004 4:23:55 PM
From: Thomas M.	Respond to of 35834

Now, during our discussion, I did say this however, "The British, the French & our Intelligence services did not rely on the forged documents. They all have continuously maintained, via other independently obtained evidence, that Saddam did indeed attempt to obtain yellowcake from Africa during the period in question. And the 16 words in the SOTUA by Bush were accurate...." And I provided these links which support those words with highly credible evidence Yes, and I shredded those sources. I specifically demonstrated that our allies were basing their conclusions on a report which was based entirely on the fake documents. Since then, you have not addressed this point. Tom