SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (12036)7/22/2004 9:50:57 AM
From: mph  Respond to of 90947
 
So let's see.

Kerry et. al decided to stiff arm Hillary.
That backfired and he had to invite her to speak.

He "didn't have a clue" about Berger and the
investigation. Did he not ask any questions?
All the veeps in the stakes were vetted to
the hilt, why not a few questions of Berger?
This should not have been a surprise.

Especially in Washington, the leak capitol.

Things like this make Kerry look reactive
rather than proactive. Since they're rather
simple things, and involve politics only,
it's interesting how inept he is.



To: longnshort who wrote (12036)7/22/2004 10:15:45 AM
From: Alan Smithee  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
Brokaw: "Did you know that [Berger] was under investigation?"
Kerry: "I didn't have a clue, not a clue."
Brokaw: "He didn't share that with you?
Kerry: "I didn't have a clue."

I saw that interview and found it interesting that Kerry evaded Brokaw's direct question "He didn't share that with you?"

Based on the response, can we now say Kerry is simply "clueless"?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News