SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (55758)7/22/2004 9:59:24 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793838
 
THE TIMES EDITORIAL BOARD WILL NOT GIVE UP
By Cori Dauber

Here's 9/11 Commission Chair Thomas Kean during the press conference for the release of the commission'a final report today:

There is "no question in our minds that there was a relationship between Iraq and al Queda."

Here's the New York Times lead editorial this morning:

The president's re-election team will try to counter these charges, just as it attacked the panel earlier for refuting Mr. Bush's claims of an alliance between Iraq and Al Qaeda (My emph.)

Yes, yes, it's true, the President in one (1, singular) speech used the word alliance. But it's also true that the administration never attacked the commission on this issue. The administration attacked the press (and specifically the New York Times) for being inaccurate in its representations of what the commission had said about the issue, and I would think the Times should be able to understand that distinction, wouldn't you?



To: LindyBill who wrote (55758)7/23/2004 8:41:34 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793838
 
The NYT doesn't believe there is a "war on terrorism."

I guess they've been influenced by the conservative writers featured here who have argued that the war on terrorism is a misnomer and should rather be the war on militant Islam. Nice to see that the Times keeps up with current thinking. <g>