Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (141287)	7/23/2004 6:48:41 AM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

It's a conspiracy, Nadine. And a coverup to boot. By comparison, W's hacks blowing Plame's cover is nothing. And W has given strict orders to get to the bottom of that one too. As far as denying information to future investigations, given how hard W tried to block the 9/11 investigation in the first place, and how hard he tried to keep information from them, that's pretty rich. Plus given the blanket indefinite hold on access W has set in place as a matter of policy for presidential papers, history as conventionally interpreted ( as opposed to "history" of the conservative "Reagan won the cold war" political propaganda sort ) is going to have to wait a really long time for any general information about W. One good thing about what Berger did, though, it gives the conservative apoplexy artists something new to wax indignant about. Beats all the long-in-the-tooth "hate America" garbage anyway.