Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (195492)	7/22/2004 11:06:00 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1591927

Tenchusatsu, keep in mind you are sharing your views with posters who were not around for the airplane hijackings of the 70s or Iran hostages or the 1972 Olympics...

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (195492)	7/22/2004 11:08:04 PM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1591927

>Z, would you have rather waited until America was attacked? By Iraq? >Would you prefer that our military responses be limited to those directly responsible for attacking us or supporting the attackers? Yes, at least until we've taken care of those. Dave can agree with me all he wants, but I think we would've taken out Osama, Mullah Omar, Al-Zawahiri, and thousands of other Al-Qaida members if we had put 150,000 troops in Afghanistan, rather than Iraq. > I'm asking them so that you may better understand why I believe the way I do. And our soldiers are dying in "Mess-o-Potamia" because too many people believe the way you do. -Z