Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (195669)	7/24/2004 2:03:35 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583348

WASHINGTON TODAY: Wavering voters have doubts about Bush, worries about economy By WILL LESTER The Associated Press 7/24/2004, 1:34 p.m. ET WASHINGTON (AP) — Voters who haven't firmly committed to a presidential candidate are in a sour mood. They tend to be more disapproving of President Bush, have a gloomier view of the economy and be more likely to think the country is headed down the wrong track. The mood of these persuadable voters prompted one veteran Republican strategist to warn the Bush campaign that dramatic steps are needed to prevent them from bolting to Democrat John Kerry. Republican strategist Tony Fabrizio, the pollster for Republican Bob Dole's presidential run in 1996, warned the GOP about the sour mood of undecided voters in battleground states, a small slice of the uncommitted voters in the electorate. Fabrizio, who supports Bush, wrote in a July 8 memo that such voters are "poised to break away from President Bush and to John Kerry." "Clearly if these undecided voters were leaning any harder against the door of the Kerry camp, they would crash right through it," he wrote, suggesting the president do more to convince voters the economy is recovering and take a more aggressive stance in defining Kerry. With polls suggesting voters are very interested in the election this year, strategists on both sides and independent analysts say they doubt negative campaigning will suppress voter turnout. "If you're interested in the election, you're going to vote," said Democratic consultant Jim Duffy. "People realize this is a pivotal election." Persuadable voters in a Associated Press poll taken by Ipsos-Public Affairs early this month were more likely to say the country was headed down the wrong track — 63 percent compared with 56 percent overall. They were more likely to disapprove of Bush's handling of the economy — 56 percent compared with 50 percent overall — and more likely to disapprove of Bush's handling of other domestic issues like health care and education — 59 percent to 52 percent overall. They also were more concerned about the economy than voters generally. Persuadable voters include those who are undecided and those whose support for a candidate was weak. Bush campaign strategist Matthew Dowd counseled Republican patience during a period that was likely to see Kerry getting a bump in the polls from the upcoming Democratic National Convention. "These undecideds are people that shift back and forth a lot based on current events," Dowd said. Perceptions of the economy are improving, Dowd said, and the Bush campaign will be advertising about what the president would do in a second term while continuing to run ads critical of Kerry. The president last week began to outline his plans for a second term — talking in general terms about expanding access to health care, improving efforts to prepare high school graduates to get jobs, and changing Social Security. The Bush campaign promises to provide details in the coming weeks. On the positive side for Bush, Republicans are united behind him, he's remained tied with Kerry in the polls despite the problems with the economy and Iraq, and he's considered stronger on handling terrorism — a pivotal issue this year. But Bush's public support is likely to be more influenced by external events, such as those in Iraq, the campaign against terror and the economy. Political analyst Thomas Mann of the Brookings Institution said it's clear that many independents and swing voters are not supporting Bush. "There is no obvious way of winning them over," he said. "Somehow Bush has to restore his luster as an effective commander in chief in the war against terrorism and raise serious doubts about Kerry as an alternative." Political scientist David Rohde of Michigan State University said Bush is in a difficult situation because "more than anything else these voters will be affected by events and affected by their views of Kerry." "The public has not yet concluded they want Kerry," said Rohde. "But they're considering him." mlive.com

To: tejek who wrote (195669)	7/24/2004 2:14:08 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1583348

Will he just fade away? RICHARD GWYN There is far more than Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat's notorious inefficiency, authoritarianism and tolerance of corruption behind the violent protests against him that have just taken place in the Gaza Strip. The 1.2 million Palestinians in Gaza live in the equivalent of an open-air jail that is grossly overcrowded, scandalously underfunded, and where the jailers are harsh and often brutal. Their already low living conditions have declined by a full one-third during the three years of the second intifada. Israeli reprisals regularly kill civilians and destroy their houses. As if all of this were not enough, the Palestinians of Gaza can daily compare their pitiable conditions with those of normal people by staring through the barbed wire at the lush fields of the Jewish settlers who, even though there are only 7,000 of them, occupy one-quarter of Gaza's land and consume one-third of its water. For Palestinians, whether in Gaza or in the West Bank, to openly protest against Arafat is almost as difficult as protesting against their Israeli jailers. That Arafat can punish and jail dissidents and has done so often, matters. The crucial factor is that he is the father of the Palestinian nation. Turning against Arafat openly is almost the equivalent of patricide. It is as difficult for Palestinians to do this as it is for Cubans to turn on Fidel Castro, his faults and failures not withstanding. Beneath the surface, though, anger, resentment and outright despair have been building up in Gaza against Arafat for a long time. Perhaps the most telling illustration of this attitude was a poll reported last month by the well-respected Palestinian Centre for Policy and Survey Research in Ramallah. It found a widespread demand for democracy. More revealing, the kind of democracy that people of Gaza most want to copy, according to the survey, is that of the Israelis. In this sense, they admire their enemies more than their own leader. A few days ago, this suppressed demand for democracy and openness — and simply for ordinary decency in government — found its rallying point. Word spread through Gaza City and through the refugee camps of an example of governmental corruption that this time involved an unrestrained contempt for the Palestinians by their own leaders. Palestinian legislators, usually a pretty docile crowd, have uncovered evidence of what has to be by far the worst scandal during the 10 years of Arafat rule. It turns out that Gaza-based companies have supplied huge amounts of cement — some 400,000 tonnes — to Israeli contractors to be used to construct the controversial wall now being built between Israel and the West Bank. The legislators have concluded that Palestinian officials accepted bribes to issue import and export licences to move the cement to Israel through Gaza from Egypt. Cairo cancelled all export permits once the destination of the material was discovered. When the legislators — led by former senior Arafat cabinet minister Abdel Jawad Saleh, who had resigned to protest the scandal — attempted to start a public debate, they were silenced. Saleh was ejected from the meeting when he tried to raise the matter. He then gave a television interview in which he called for "peaceful demonstrations to bring down the legislative council." The discovery of this trading with the enemy was the trigger that finally brought the people of Gaza out into the streets against Arafat. Sensing the magnitude of the change of attitude, Prime Minister Ahmed Qureira resigned. Arafat, who is the great survivor, has apparently survived this crisis. He has persuaded Qureira to withdraw his resignation by promising greater power over the security services. In typical Arafat style, there are 13 of these security agencies, all fiercely competing. Other crises are inevitable. Sooner or later, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon will implement his plan to withdraw the Jewish settlers from Gaza. Most, in fact, will be resettled in the West Bank. Once the Israeli army withdraws, an all-out struggle for power will break out between the Islamic fundamentalists of Hamas and Arafat's officials, and his now dwindling number of supporters there. An actual civil war, although often predicted, in fact isn't likely. Neither will Arafat himself ever step down. The probability instead is that, increasingly, Arafat's authority will dwindle to the symbolic and the ceremonial. He is still the father of his people. But, for the first time, they have shown they are ready to tell him openly that it's time for him to go. Whether the democracy Palestinians have shown they want, or a religious dictatorship will come after Arafat goes, will determine whether Gaza's sickness will continue indefinitely, or begin, at last, to heal. thestar.com