Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (37536)	7/25/2004 2:06:39 PM
From: CalculatedRisk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Thanks Chinu. In general I support your position, but when one poster attacks another, it upsets me. We have had some recent examples. Obviously, we have found NO WMD in Iraq. But the extremists get upset at that simple statement ... They scream: "What about the handful of old shells from the 1980s with traces of Sarin?" Obviously no rational or reasonable person would consider those WMD. "We have found NO WMD in Iraq" is an accurate description of events and requires no caveat. Another example: There was NO evidence of ties between Iraq and al Qaeda. They were not allies, and Bush's prior claims are false. But once again the extremists get upset ... "What about the casual contacts described in the report?" they scream. Once again, no rational or reasonable person would consider those contacts "ties" nor would those contacts (some with Osama trying to take out Saddam) make them "allies". That is absurd. Once again, I generally support your position. And I will continue to write the truth without caveats: We have found NO WMD in Iraq. There is no evidence of ties between Iraq and al Qaeda. Thanks for the thread!