Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (56131)	7/25/2004 6:51:34 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793896

That distinction might do for a number of cultural/artistic issues, but it is a total cop-out when applied to the NYT's ham-fisted political coverage. That's why I'm waiting to see what Brooks comes up with. I don't read the Times regularly so I don't have a clear impression other than what I already commented nor do I have the tools or the inclination to do my own analysis. There are plenty of examples posted here of bias, some of them actually legitimate <g>, but they are just examples. We have no balance. We don't know the proportion or types of news stories that have that bias other than the social issues. I am hopeful that Brooks has the wherewithal to deal with large quantities of data over time. Like I said earlier, I will wait and see what he comes up with regarding "politics and policies."