Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (195857)	7/25/2004 9:19:08 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572620

re: Another way of looking at it is by examining the difference between a legislator and an executive. The former is analytical and focused on details; the latter is concerned with taking action and getting results. The latter is concerned with taking action that get's positive results. You keep coming back to the same thing; Bush is good because he does something, even if it's the wrong thing. 900 lives, most of the world thinking we are the most dangerous country, huge deficits, most of the ME unstable, Bush certainly did something. It's pretty simple for me, I've lived through a lot of President's that made mostly good decisions that made the world and the US an incrementally better and safer place, both Dems and Reps. Bush has "taken more action" than any President I remember, but the results have been decisively negative. If that's OK with you, then there is nothing we have to discuss. But let me ask you one last question. After reading the New Yorker article, did you have even just a little bit more respect for Kerry? John