Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (291705)	7/26/2004 9:18:02 AM
From: redfish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

John Edwards was actually more hawkish than Bush on Iraq (claimed Iraq would have nuclear capability within a year), and Kerry voted in favor of the war. Edwards co-sponsored the resolution to give bush power to invade iraq: "Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal." senate.gov Neither has come out against the war, and the democratic platform does not come out against the war. The only candidate running against the war is Nader.