SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gamesmistress who wrote (56253)7/26/2004 1:48:01 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 794237
 
Conservative Blogworld is pretty well lined up on Sullivan. Powerline blog

With conservatives like these, who needs liberals?

Andrew Sullivan thnks that "Kerry may be the right man - and the conservative choice - for a difficult and perilous time." If, on the issues that matter most to him, Sullivan prefers Senator Kerry's views to President Bush's, then Sullivan's preference for Kerry makes perfect sense. But to claim that the most liberal member of the Senate, with a McGovernite track record that pre-dates McGovern's 1972 candidacy, may be the "conservative choice" is sophistry.

The Islamofascists have bet that the U.S. is too unserious and decadent to sustain an effective war against terrorism. To the extent that Americans reject strong war leadership due to parochial concerns -- for example, because the war leader doesn't want a handful of state courts imposing gay marriage on the rest of the country -- the Islamofascist wager doesn't look like a bad one.

HINDROCKET adds: For a while, Andrew Sullivan was a powerful and effective pro-national security, and mostly conservative, voice. His web site was one of the inspirations that prompted me to start blogging. But once the possibility of gay marriage opened up, Andrew could think of little else. It has been obvious for the past year that he has been preparing to endorse the Democratic nominee, whoever he may be. Andrew may or may not be fooling himself when he paints a pro-security veneer on his support for John Kerry, but he isn't fooling anyone else.



To: gamesmistress who wrote (56253)7/26/2004 3:24:50 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 794237
 
Even then you have too many people who think things should be "fair", meaning, I want what the other guy has without having to work for it.

It should be easier at the federal level because handouts aren't a federal function. If states or localities want to play that way, let them, but it should be easier to say "no" at the federal level. In theory... <g>