Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (195902)	7/26/2004 2:44:48 PM
From: BlackDog777	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573694

Answered just like an obfuscating liberal. I can get you plenty of empirical evidence, but would it really matter? You got caught neck-deep in bullshit and instead of getting out, you decided to drown in it. It was really hard to tract you down...pull up your name and most recent post...it must have been a whopping 8 seconds. What a twerp.

To: tejek who wrote (195902)	7/27/2004 10:29:46 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1573694

However, that matters little to me.......it remains my opinion that a table of good players following the rules enhances my chance of winning at BJ. That opinion comes from MY experience as a BJ player. In fact, when I won the 5k it was at just such a table. This is a ridiculous assertion that is easily disproven. I refer you to Griffin's "Theory of Blackjack" and Schlessinger's "Blackjack Attack". How I play my game has absolutely nothing to do with other player's winning or losing. As a card counter, one frequently makes plays that do not coincide with others' beliefs or Basic Strategy (such as hitting 12 vs. 6 or even splitting tens). I find that others at the table often scoff at my play as "costing them money" for one reason or another. But they fail to notice that such oddball plays SAVE THEM MONEY just as frequently.