Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (141504)	7/26/2004 3:05:24 PM
From: Don Hurst	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

>>"And a creationist will find no comfort in Science Times. Not that creationists should expect to find comfort in Science Times. Newspapers have the right to decide what's important and what's not. But their editors must also expect that some readers will think: "This does not represent me or my interests. In fact, it represents my enemy." So is it any wonder that the offended or befuddled reader might consider everything else in the paper - including, say, campaign coverage - suspicious as well?"<< The above from Okrent's article...if you are offended and befuddled, don't read the paper, particularly since Okrent's main point is that the national NY Times has surprise, surprise, a New York City cultural bias. If that is too much for you to handle stick to the WSJ cultural pages, Washington Times and Newsmax.