SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (56437)7/27/2004 7:39:06 AM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 794293
 
He at least needs to make another stab at explaining his action to Americans. His first attempt showed was nothing but arrogant contempt for us.



To: Tom Clarke who wrote (56437)7/27/2004 7:46:15 AM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794293
 
He should never been allowed to leave the building if they saw him putting papers in his pants and socks.. The people hired to protect records should be fired.



To: Tom Clarke who wrote (56437)7/27/2004 12:53:13 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794293
 
INDEED! Now we learn that Mr. Berger wanted to keep some of those chips hidden.

Whatever Mr. Berger's legal liabilities, the largest interest here is less what he did than why a sophisticated ex-National Security Adviser would do it. And for that we need to see what he was hiding.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News