Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (56453)	7/27/2004 11:01:43 AM
From: John Carragher	Respond to of 794327

I thought the removal of documents happen over a few trips. not the once of suspect and then set up of sting.

To: Ilaine who wrote (56453)	7/27/2004 11:22:03 AM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794327

<<< Berger should not have been allowed to leave the building with top secret documents, even ones which were archived. But then, the archivists at first did not realize what he was doing, until they went to put the documents back and saw that some were missing.>>> This is not to excuse anything Berger did, but what kind of place is this where you can check out top secret (I think they are higher classifications than top secret) documents (and or only copies) and people can leave without returning them. If Berger can do this, so can others. How many others have done this or is sting operations SOP? If Berger is convicted, I think the people that operate this place should be fired. They are dangerous to our safety.