Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (141603)	7/27/2004 10:04:04 AM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

How fitting! foxnews.com

To: Win Smith who wrote (141603)	7/27/2004 11:28:30 AM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Dance, dance, true believer, conventional reality, true believer, dance, spin, conventional reality, spin, spin, cheesy debate trick, sneer, looking glass, looking glass, cheesy debate trick, sneer, sneer.. C'mon, Win, how about something substantive about Okrent's editorial, instead of the same old tired and tiresome stuff? Do you agree with Okrent? If not, why not? Is there a place for advocacy on the front page or should it go somewhere else? Do you agree with Sulzburger's justification? If so, why? If not, why not? What about the "urban audience" business? Is it fair to assume that all urban audiences are liberal? Even if so, is it good journalism to tailor reporting to the tastes of the readers? Is the reason you rarely address substantive issues and prefer instead to engage in personal invective the fact that you are incapable of doing so? Or is it simply your preferred mode of "discourse?"