Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (141634)	7/27/2004 2:10:39 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

For the most part the inspection process had reined in his efforts on wmds and had resulted in the destruction of existing stocks of wmds. This is simply untrue. Very large stocks of wmds remained unaccounted for by the inspections - and were still unaccounted for. Furthermore, there were no inspections from 1998 - 2003, and would never have been again without an entire invading army on the border, a small point you keep trying to overlook. Is "inspections" some magical process that can be declared to "succeed" even when the inspectors have been driven out of the country? Your whole argument rests on a classic post hoc, ergo propter hoc fallacy.