Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (195972)	7/27/2004 2:30:19 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573920

it is impossible to carry on even the simplest exchange with you since you cannot stay focused on what is being discussed. Have you thought that the problem may be your poor communications skills? He simply asked for one example of the stated dishonesty. When one calls someone dishonest in a public forum, it isn't unreasonable to ask for at least one example. I didn't say he was dishonest.......I said he played hard and fast with the truth. There is a difference......or is that too subtle for you to get? You refused to do that. And when called on that again, you changed the subject to LPS5's political orientation. That's where the intellectual dishonesty comes in. I see......since you are the ultimate arbiter in intellectual dishonesty, where the fukk were you or LPbutthead yesterday when DR accused CNBC and myself of lying over the problems Google was having? Where were you geniuses yesterday when DR called me an idiot for suggesting that we could make up the shortfall in SS funding through creating a line item in the national budget or when he accused me of acting as if I am an authority on the issue when I never ever came close to making that claim or when he implied that the only way to cure the problem is by investing SS funds in the stock markets? Excuse me, but I question your motives in this matter. Your very recent history here makes me skeptical that you really are trying to promote intellectual honesty on this thread. LPS5 went through a lot of hoops to get you to try and support your accusation. You refused and changed the subject, I hope you see that and the dishonest morality behind it. Look.......let me make this real clear. I do not intend to jump through hoops and do a lot of research to satisfy the concerns of someone who suddenly gets a bug up their butt over my posting style. Too many people on SI are critics without doing the homework that would enable them authentically to be in such a position. Clearly, both you and LPbutthead are of that genre.....you criticize me but apparently DR's ample past transgressions are of no concern to you. It doesn't take a genius to figure out why that is. So have a nice day......and don't let the door hit you in the butt as you leave! Come back when you are ready to do the walk!