Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (141660)	7/27/2004 4:03:40 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

But Okrent's editorial had nothing to do with foreign affairs, or the NYT coverage of foreign affairs either. Now, who's twisting things around to fit their own personal Wilson / Berger obsession? Not me, not the NYT, not Okrent. Say what? What have you been smoking? I don't know, Winnie, you are surely missing something if you don't see the reference Okrent made to "liberal theology" saturating the editorial pages which, of course, are themselves saturated with foreign affairs discussions. What is so hard about that? I listed a bunch of your posts in which you defended the NYT, you know, the newspaper you don't read. You are really amusing today, Winnie. Can't understand an editorial written by a guy whose newspaper you either do or don't read but which you nevertheless defend. Talk about the looking glass. Edit: I think I got it. You don't read the NYT editorials. Ergo, you didn't read the Okrent piece. 'splains it all.