SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (141666)7/27/2004 4:52:16 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
It is a popular fallacy to imagine the worst, take it to the extreme, and then use it as justification for wrongful actions. Using this kind of logic we should execute children who steal candy because surely they will become armed robbers who murder innocent people...now on to your points:

Firstly, we did not bring Stalin to power; he got there on his own and with the help of Germans. Nor did we support him against his internal enemies or tried to direct his policies. So unlike the dictators we brought to power and trained their secret police force, we were not responsible for Stalin's actions.

Nor did We really "ally" ourselves with Stalin. We fought Hitler and so did he. Stalin would have fought Hitler regardless of what we did because Hitler had invaded Russia. Similarly, we would have fought Hitler regardless of Stalin, because of a number of reasons, including the Japanese attack on our base.

Finally, there is no comparison between fighting Hitler in the middle of WWII after we fully understood who we are dealing with, and fighting some socialist rebels who mostly want to free their country and improve the lives of their people. Unless you have a direct line to the Almighty, I don't see how you could say that efforts to support Ho Chi Minh and provide incentives for a more democratic regime in Vietnam would have been as disastrous as Hitler had been for Europe.

To make this an analogy for our actions in Vietnam or support of the various thugships, many of whom we brought to power in the first place, is beyond comparing apples and oranges. See if you can find a comparable example that fits the pattern better.

Sun (do you not really see this?!) Tzu



To: Neocon who wrote (141666)7/27/2004 8:37:33 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
I've thought this a bit more and I think I can make the case for the need to defend Diem vs. Ho using your own lesser evil logic. A case can be made that Stalin was less evil than Hitler, therefore necessity made us choose him. Now can you make a similar case for other US military adventures, say North vs. South Vietnam?