Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: unclewest who wrote (56568)	7/28/2004 1:13:15 AM
From: KLP	Respond to of 793999

Cheney to Democrats: Weakness Invites Terror news.myway.com\|top\|07-27-2004::14:52\|reuters.html [Funny, if you read the first sentence here, and the go to Drudge, and see the picture of Kerry totally in the midst of all the big guns on a ship, you'll laugh too...] Jul 27, 2:48 PM (ET) By Adam Entous CAMP PENDLETON, Calif. (Reuters) - Flanked by American flags and howitzers, Vice President Dick Cheney on Tuesday defended the war in Iraq and a policy of preemptive attack against criticism from Democrats at their national convention. With President Bush staying out of the political fray at his Crawford, Texas, ranch, Cheney was on the West Coast to rally fellow Republicans for the November election and counter charges by Democrats meeting in Boston. "Terrorist attacks are not caused by the use of strength. They are invited by the perception of weakness," Cheney said at Camp Pendleton on the Southern California coast. Cheney said Americans were safer and he stood by prewar characterizations of Iraq as a threat despite the failure to find weapons of mass destruction and new warnings by Cheney and other administration officials that another major terrorist attack may be coming. On the first day of their four-day convention, Democrats drew a stark contrast between Bush and Democratic presidential rival John Kerry. Former President Jimmy Carter and former Vice President Al Gore launched the first salvos on Monday, accusing Bush and Cheney of destroying U.S. credibility around the world. Carter said the United States "cannot lead if our leaders mislead" and that Bush's agenda had polarized the country. Former President Bill Clinton said Bush had squandered the good will of the world after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Cheney countered that the United States had the right to attack foes before it was attacked and described the invasion of Iraq in terms of the wider U.S.-led war on terror. Democrats say the 2003 Iraq war was a costly diversion from the war on terror. "Having seen the devastation caused by 19 men armed with knives, box cutters and boarding passes, we awakened to a possibility even more lethal," Cheney said. "President Bush is determined to remove threats before they arrive instead of simply awaiting for another attack on our country. So America acted to end the regime of Saddam Hussein," Cheney said. Despite violence in Iraq and the threat of new al Qaeda attacks in the United States, Cheney told the 2,500 Marines and sailors: "Sixteen months ago, Iraq was a gathering threat to the United States and the civilized world. Now it is a rising democracy, an ally in the war on terror and the American people are safer for it," Cheney said. As part of his campaign pitch for Bush, Cheney quoted selectively from the final report of the Sept. 11 commission about the "lethal" threat posed by al Qaeda. The commission criticized the Bush administration -- along with the Clinton administration -- for failing to grasp or effectively combat the threat posed by al Qaeda and recommended a radical shake-up of U.S. intelligence. Cheney was a critic of the commission's work behind-the-scenes, but he praised its final report as "very well done as government documents go."

To: unclewest who wrote (56568)	7/28/2004 4:14:23 AM
From: tbancroft	Respond to of 793999

The bottom line is this; decide what you want and vote for the leader who promises it to you...If you believe him. There's the rub. I think that there is so much about government and governing that involves dealing with the unknown (no matter what the 20-20 hindsighters think should have been obvious at the time) that the real issue for me is whether or not I trust a leader's guidance in those unforeseen situations. That is why the GOP is making such a big deal about the Kerry waffling, since that gets to the heart of the trust factor. Unfortunately, I think that isn't what drives the Dems. Most of the Bush-bashers will admit that they have a very good idea of what Bush will do in most situations - they actually do trust him to be consistent. They just don't agree with what they know his choices will be. For that matter, most of the voters who look at things like voting records have a very good idea of what Kerry will do in most situations. The election-year strategy of the Dems is one of image, created for the remaining block of voters who don't really spend a lot of time thinking about their leaders, but simply listen to promises, thinking (hoping?) that the words are indicative of the person speaking.