Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (196083)	7/28/2004 3:01:42 AM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572446

David, Okay, fine. Then change it to, "What's brought into question is how this country reacts negatively to strong women leaders, when international countries do not." RE: "I do have a problem with rich people who would have us believe they have OUR interests in mind when it is clear they're looking out for number one." I think there are two philosophies. Some think it's better to help the bottom, to stimulate up. Some think it's better to help the top, to stimulate down. Both are probably well-intentioned and are simply different approaches. RE: "YOU WOULD HAVE HAD A FIT IF BUSH OR CHENEY HAD REFUSED TO DISCLOSE THEIR TAX RETURNS" Who refused to disclose their tax returns and why? RE: "Cheney has been shredded by the Left over his supposed connection with Haliburton" I have a relative that works in management at Haliburton. We mix like oil and water : ) According to CNN, Cheney is receiving more than $100k/year right this minute. To get back to my question, why do you think it's okay that Cheney uses the F* word, but it is not okay if THK uses the 'shove it' phrase. (I think neither are okay) Regards, Amy J