SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (596390)7/28/2004 8:36:19 AM
From: tonto  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Naturally the democrats are afraid of Bush, a republican. The race is tight and Kerry is weakening...a democrat should be afraid of Bush if they want the White House.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (596390)7/28/2004 8:48:54 AM
From: PROLIFE  Respond to of 769670
 
Fear

it's all the Dem leaders have....it is how they keep their subjects down on the farm and voting for them...



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (596390)7/28/2004 9:04:36 AM
From: Andrew N. Cothran  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
July 28, 2004,Meet the Left:Don't be fooled by the TV spinmeisters.

Boston, Mass — I'm stuck in Boston doing some radio and TV interviews and I feel as though I'm in one of those sci-fi movies like Escape from New York where the U.S. government turns Manhattan into a penal farm and the streets are filled with nothing but packs of awful and maniacal criminals. These folks who've come to Boston this week aren't dangerous (though their ideas are), but it's almost as if a condition of entry this week at Logan Airport is having a few screws loose.

The Democratic National Convention can best be described as a lavish Bush-bashing festival. (Unfortunately, they're not here to protest steel tariffs or a doubling of the education budget.) These people detest Bush the way cats detest bathtubs.

Of course, the party organizers are terrified that the American public will actually see these Bush haters foaming at the mouth and twitching at the very name of George W., so they have adopted a theme here: "Keep the message positive." Part of the trick is to ask the delegates to masquerade as normal people, or at least virtually normal people. In effect, they are saying to the party faithful, "You know the way you always act. Don't be that way. At least for 96 hours, wash your hair, be polite, pretend you actually like America and work at a real job."

The TV networks have accommodated in promoting this charade. The panoramic shots of the convention give the impression that there's no one here in Beantown but middle-class, flag-waving, child-hugging bus drivers and construction workers and soccer moms and grandmothers who are infuriated by Bush's economic failures and his ill-conceived war games.

Don't be fooled by the spinmeisters. These people are not middle America. When you go into the bakeries, you can actually purchase wedding cakes with two brides on the top. A baker tells me even straight couples are purchasing these ultra-chic wedding cakes, as a sign of solidarity. The best-selling t-shirt shows George Washington standing aside George W. Bush. Under Washington the caption reads: "Could not tell a lie." Under Bush the caption: "Could not tell the truth." Every third car has a bumper sticker screaming: "RE-DEFEAT BUSH IN 2004." And then, of course, there are the many forms of advocacy for regime change in America. Leftist protesters give out placards reading: "George Bush is a lying sack of s%$@." Gee, I remember when liberals said hate wasn't a family value.

It seems every person I have met here is either a trial lawyer (the Edwards Brigade), a school teacher (about one third of the delegates are traditionally NEA members), a politician, a discontented student whining about cuts in school aid, or a lobbyist for a Washington-based tax-eating organization. These folks have as much interest in tax cuts as Linda Ronstadt has in lo-cal desserts. The common refrain from all of them is: more, more, more. More school funding, more child care, more taxes on the rich, more peanuts served on airlines, more drive-by abortions, more bilingual education, more pennants for the Red Sox (they are after all entitled, are they not?), more drivers licenses for illegal aliens.

Oh, and the hypocrisy. Receptions this week are hosted by multimillionaire trial lawyers and Hollywood stars munching on imported Caviar and sucking down French Merlots while protesting how unfair Bush's policies have been for poor people. The only thing these upper-crust liberals know about how the other half lives is gleaned when maids from Guatamala come to turn their beds down and lay a Godiva Chocolate on their pillows.

Perhaps the most memorable moment for me was when two antiwar protesters with "Make Love, Not War" shirts (I'm not making this up) strutted in front of my taxi and shouted expletives, daring us to run them over.

I'm no George W. cheerleader myself, as regular readers of NRO can attest, but I'm more convinced than ever now of how dangerous the Kerry-Edwards Democrats really are. This is not Bill Clinton's party — I don't care what Hillary and Al Hunt say. The façade of New Democrat moderation has been stripped to the bone. Every Democrat pundit I have spoken to here has stressed John Kerry's moderation and fiscal-conservative credentials. Kerry will be just like Clinton on the economy, they say. But Clinton ran as a free trader; Kerry campaigned in the primaries against free trade. Clinton signed into law a cut in the capital-gains tax; Kerry promises to raise it. Clinton supported welfare reform; Kerry has voted against it. Clinton was a moderate governor; Kerry is the number one liberal in the Senate. If Kerry can carry off this New Democrat label, then I'm Michael Jordan Jr. with a 40-inch vertical leap about to play for the U.S. Olympic dream-team in Athens.

Engaging the Democratic faithful in even playful debate on issues can be exacerbating. When a group of students were denouncing Bush's tax cuts for the rich, I asked them how it is that the percentage of taxes paid by the rich went up, not down, after the Bush tax cuts. Blank stares and open jaws. Twenty seconds into the debate and they were already out of intellectual ammunition — and these kids go to Ivy League schools. One stunningly obtuse girl from Vasser told me she favors Kerry because what she wants most in 21st-century America is "a radical redistribution in wealth." I tried to politely remind her that any third-rate dictator can redistribute wealth (even Pol Pot was good at that); the hard part is creating wealth.

I'll escape Boston with a sense of relief, yes, but also and mostly with terror that in six months these oddballs and misfits may actually be running the government. I have this recurring nightmare of Michael Moore as secretary of state, Al Franken as treasury secretary, and Barbara Streisand on the Supreme Court.

Groucho Marx once famously said he didn't want to belong to any club that would have him as a member. Well, I would never want to have a president who is a member of a political party who would have chumps like these as members. It seems unjust that so many pin-headed liberals could convene at one time under one roof when so many of them promised they would leave the country if George W. Bush became president.

Typical liberals: They never keep their word.

— Stephen Moore is president of the Club for Growth



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (596390)7/28/2004 9:53:26 AM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 769670
 
The democrats are the party of fear...



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (596390)7/28/2004 10:02:22 AM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 769670
 
J'accuse! The Republicans want to win in '04

Jonah Goldberg

July 28, 2004
BOSTON - When Homer Simpson ran for the office of sanitation commissioner, he offered this stirring call to arms: "Animals are crapping in our houses and we're picking it up. Did we lose a war? That's not America!" The crowd went wild and Homer won the race.

After the first night of speeches here at the Democratic Convention, it's pretty clear the Democrats are borrowing from Homer's playbook. Here's the drill: State the obvious as if it is insightful. Then twist it to make it sound like the Republicans are fools or ogres for not seeing the wisdom in what you're saying.

"The Republicans in Washington believe that America should be run by the right people - their people," Bill Clinton declared to thunderous applause here Monday night.

What in the world is he talking about? This is an election, right? The Republicans think Republicans should run things. Democrats think Democrats should. Is there something I'm missing? Are Republicans somehow "cheating" because their campaign platform suggests that their own party is the right one to run America?

This was one of the many ironies, alas, lost on the Democrats.

So, too, was the rather rum spectacle of Jimmy Carter lecturing about the need to "restore the greatness of America" and gird American strength around the globe. Then again, maybe I'm wrong. Perhaps on the morning of September 11, 2001, millions cried in anguish, "If only Jimmy Carter were president!"

Aside from his shockingly gratuitous and unpresidential cheap shots about Bush's military service - wasn't it Carter who pardoned all those honest-to-God draft-dodgers? - what stood out in Carter's oration was his tendency to attribute so many of the world's longest-running and most intractable problems to George W. Bush. "Violence has gripped the Holy Land," Carter intoned. Talk about walking into the movie half way through. Violence has gripped the Holy land for a very, very long time. In fact, bears have been using the woods as a bathroom since George Bush has been president, too. That's not exactly George W. Bush's fault. (Indeed, the worst flare-up of violence occurred after Bill Clinton failed to seal a peace deal in 2000 between Yassir Arafat and Ehud Barak.)

This is just a small sample of the convention's rhetorical drift so far. The Democrats have decided George Bush is guilty of every charge imaginable until proven innocent, and they are not interested in considering any evidence to the contrary. Admittedly, that's the nature of conventions, which are essentially giant choirs hungry to be preached to. Nevertheless, what varies from convention to convention and party to party is the credibility of those assumptions, and here the Democrats come up wanting.

The Boston Democrats take it as a fact that George W. Bush deliberately divides people, and for bad reasons. Time and again, Clinton insisted that Republicans "need a divided America." Jimmy Carter accused Bush of lying, or of "manipulating the truth" about the war in order to "generate public panic." The analysis behind such convictions goes something like this: George W. Bush enjoyed an astronomically high approval rating after 9/11 and the war with Afghanistan. But for political motives no one can explain, he chose "to divide" Americans and risk that popularity by "lying" about a war we didn't need to fight.

None of this is supposed to make sense on a rational level. These are expressions of faith. And for the Democratic Party, a Republican is by definition "divisive" whenever he does things Democrats don't like. It's similar to the way Democrats bang their high chairs about "wedge issues" - which is to say, issues that work better for Republicans than Democrats.

Speaker after speaker insisted that President Bush was a dangerous unilateralist who broke the common bonds of the international community. Among the evidence cited by Bill Clinton was George Bush's refusal to participate in the International Criminal Court and the Kyoto treaty. Never mind that Clinton took pretty much the same position when he was president. Bush is a dangerous maverick! Similarly, speaker after speaker took John Kerry's word for it that he has the sort of charm necessary to persuade the "international community" to share the burden in Iraq and Afghanistan it now refuses.

In other words, as with Homer Simpson, the Democrats are in denial. Homer thinks that someone else needs to clean up the messes in our homes, that somehow it's unfair that we should do our own dirty work. The Democrats have convinced themselves that George Bush unfairly - "divisively" - interrupted the holiday from history that was the 1990s. This is all nonsense, of course. But that's beside the point.

townhall.com