Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (52318)	7/29/2004 8:49:51 AM
From: T L Comiskey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

The Sooner We Get Serious, the Better By Denis Hayes Statement of Denis Hayes American Solar Energy Society Conference Portland, OR Sunday 11 July 2004 In recent years, a consensus has emerged in the geophysical and meteorological fields that human emissions of greenhouse gases have begun to change the earth's climate. While major uncertainties remain about the details, there is widespread agreement that the impacts of this change will be mostly harmful, and that it is in the human interest to limit future emissions of CO2 from burning coal, oil, and natural gas as much as possible. No one has yet produced a credible blueprint for achieving the necessary reductions in greenhouse gases in which solar energy does not play a very large role. In my personal view, it would be desirable to produce more than half the world's commercial energy from solar sources within the next few decades. The solar electric cell was invented at Bell labs fifty years ago. Most of the major technical advances of the last five decades have similarly been made in the United States. Many of them have been underwritten with US tax dollars. As recently as 1998, the United States still produced more solar photovoltaic modules than any other country. Given the incredibly small volumes produced, this is more an indictment of the world than a credit to us. Then, within a year, Japan leapt into a commanding lead, and it has since widened the gap every year. Last year, Japan produced 3-1/2 times as many solar cells as the United States. About the same time, Germany, Holland, and several other European countries began putting in place policies to promote solar electricity. Last year, Europe produced 80 percent more cells than the United States. At some point in the very near future, solar cells are poised to become a classic disruptive technology. As prices fall with economies of mass production, demand will skyrocket around the world. The policy question facing the United States is whether we will be exporting solar cells to the world or instead be importing solar cells from Japan while we desperately play catch-up - much as we are currently doing with efficient hybrid automobiles. The Bush Administration, and the Republican leadership of the House and Senate, are committed to an energy policy designed by the Vice President that is dismissive of any important role for solar energy. This is a prescription for economic catastrophe. It hitches American prosperity to a fuel concentrated in mostly in a handful of unstable Middle Eastern countries that, when burned, changes the climate. What America needs instead are: A $30 billion, five-year federal procurement of solar modules, structured to reward falling prices. Solar arrays should be on the roofs and south-facing walls of every army barracks, every post office, every school, and every library in the country, starting in the sun belt and moving north. The United States should adopt the highly-successful German buyback model that overcomes the resistance of ordinary consumers who don't want to buy this year because they believe prices will fall next year. At least a ten year extension of the federal production tax credit for renewable energy. Long-term predictability is of enormous importance to companies that we are asking to make major investments in new manufacturing facilities. The on-again, off-again nature of American tax credits has destroyed many good companies. In the event that there is no political change or policy change in the federal government, then America's best hope lies in efforts to aggregate similar initiatives at the state and local levels. A wide variety of these are currently underway and will be discussed at this conference. Twenty-five years ago, in calling for much the same program, I argued that a solar transition, phased in over the next half century, need be neither painful nor very expensive. We - and, frankly, the rest of the world - have largely wasted the last quarter century. Total global photovoltaic production last year was a paltry 742 megawatts. I no longer offer any hope that such a transition can be painless or cheap. However, I continue to believe it might at least still be possible to achieve this huge transformation of the world's basic energy system in time to avoid an irreversible climatic catastrophe. But with each passing year, each passing month, each passing week, the odds grow slimmer. At some point - perhaps sometime soon - it will simply be too late, even with a mobilization of resources akin to that which followed Pearl Harbor. The sooner we get serious, the better. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Denis Hayes founded the first Earth Day celebration in 1970. He was the director of the federal Solar Energy Research Institute (now renamed the National Renewable Energy Laboratory) during the Carter Administration. He is currently President of the Bullitt Foundation in Seattle, WA. -------