Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GST who wrote (141842)	7/29/2004 9:40:34 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Well, we have disarmed them. And we are not going to sponsor future terrorist actions on their part like Saddam's government did. We're taking heat from antiwar types about the terrorists we've detained in Guatanamo so presumably you wouldn't want us to detain them forever. About the only other thing we could do is hand them over to Tehran, something which human rights groups oppose. I think we both know what would happen if we did that. So what do you think we ought to do with the 3,000 detainees? Do you care or is your only interest in them is that they give you an excuse to accuse the US of harboring terrorists - as you've already done? Hmm, you are making a big point about this terror outfit which happens to have been Saddam-sponsored. I guess it would still be in operation if the US had left Saddam in power as you propose we should have done.