Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (38704)	7/29/2004 3:06:52 PM
From: Emile Vidrine	Respond to of 81568

"No resources were diverted" $200 billion and 140,000 young Americans occupying Iraq are, in your opinion, simply a mirage? 1000 young Americans dead and another 6000 serously wounded. Is that also a mirage? If these $200 billion and 140,000 American soldiers had been directed to finding Bin Laden and destroying Al Qaeda, the war would probably already be won. Instead, Bush has used our military to secure the powerful Jewish-American vote in the 2004 presidential election. How did he buy this powerful Jewish support? He has used our military to secure Israel's eastern flank by invading Iraq and threatening Iran and Syria, he has, under the direction of the Jewish lobby, used our Defense, State, and Justice Depts. to classify Palestinian liberation organizations as terrorist organization, and he has diverted much needed military and intelligence resources to help maintain Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories. Israeli security is the conrnerstone of the new Bush doctrine.

To: Bill who wrote (38704)	7/29/2004 3:13:28 PM
From: CalculatedRisk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Shifts from bin Laden hunt evoke questions By Dave Moniz and Steven Komarow, USA TODAY usatoday.com WASHINGTON — In 2002, troops from the 5th Special Forces Group who specialize in the Middle East were pulled out of the hunt for Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan to prepare for their next assignment: Iraq. Their replacements were troops with expertise in Spanish cultures. The CIA, meanwhile, was stretched badly in its capacity to collect, translate and analyze information coming from Afghanistan. When the White House raised a new priority, it took specialists away from the Afghanistan effort to ensure Iraq was covered. Those were just two of the tradeoffs required because of what the Pentagon and CIA acknowledge is a shortage of key personnel to fight the war on terrorism. The question of how much those shifts prevented progress against al-Qaeda and other terrorists is putting the Bush administration on the defensive. Even before the invasion, the wisdom of shifting resources from the bin Laden hunt to the war in Iraq was raised privately by top military officials and publicly by Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., and others. Now it's being hotly debated again following an election-year critique of the Bush administration by its former counterterrorism adviser, Richard Clarke. <MORE IN ARTICLE>

To: Bill who wrote (38704)	7/29/2004 3:18:40 PM
From: CalculatedRisk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

More SHIFTS from Bin Laden: ...an NBC report suggests that as early as spring of 2002, only a few months after the defeat of the Taliban, the war against al-Qaeda was already being compromised by preparation for war in Iraq: “There were decisions made,” says Flynt Leverett, a former director at the National Security Council in the Bush White House, “to take key assets, human assets, technical assets, out of theater in Afghanistan in order to position them for the campaign to unseat Saddam.” ....NBC News has learned that in one still-classified incident in Yemen, commanders wanted to engage what sources call a “viable mission against an al-Qaida target.” After all, in the past they had used the missiles on the remotely piloted drones to strike at terrorists. But in this case, because of the Iraq war, there was not a Predator they could use. The al-Qaida target got away. What’s more, members of the CIA’s elite special activities division and the Army’s entire 5th Special Forces Group (Green Berets), who’d hunted down hundreds of al-Qaida terrorists, were pulled out of Afghanistan. The 5th, based in Fort Campbell, Kent., specializes in the Middle East and Central Asia. These soldiers are the ones who speak Arabic and Central Asian languages. ....Rick Francona, a retired Air Force colonel and an NBC News analyst, says that another valuable resource in the war against al-Qaida was a high-tech surveillance plane called the RC-135 “Rivet Joint.” “It’s not just the platform itself, it’s the linguists that man the platform,” Francona says. “They were being really overworked.” A squadron of the RC-135s was deployed to “Operation Enduring Freedom” in 2001, says Air Force spokeswoman Beth Kelly, but they stopped prowling the skies over Afghanistan in May 2002....“I don’t think there is any question that the effort against al-Qaida was degraded,” Francona says.