SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: techguerrilla who wrote (38731)7/29/2004 3:57:13 PM
From: BillRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
I believe the people's money belongs to the people. Giving it back to the folks who paid it is the least this government can do. Bush has made a lot of mistakes, but that was not one of them.



To: techguerrilla who wrote (38731)7/29/2004 4:04:38 PM
From: Emile VidrineRespond to of 81568
 
Over 50% of the tax cut went to 1% of the super rich. Over one trillion dollars went to the super rich while the rest went to the 99% of the American taxpayers.

Warrne Buffett, one of the riches men in America, admitted that Bush's tax cut was a disgrace. Under the Bush plan, Buffett's secretary pays more taxes than Buffett since his income comes almost completely from dividends. What a disgrace! Those who are struggling to make ends meet, the middle-class, received the least percentage wise.

How can you stimulate the economy by cutting taxes for the super rich? The super rich already spend as much as they desire to spend. That's the very definition of being rich. You buy whatever you desire to buy. The middle-class, on the other hand, is in great needs of additional funds and will immediately put these dollars back into the economy.