Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Earl who wrote (7572)	7/30/2004 11:40:12 AM
From: Rock_nj	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

You know normally, talk of controlled demolitions would be off in conspiracy loony land. But, I remeber on 9/11 watching CNN and the commentator saying that it appeared as if there was an explosion or demolition of some kind as a tower collapsed. That was an on-scene report. Then, add to that the way the WTC materials were rushed away without proper investigation, and sent to a smelter in New Jersey, and it no longer sounds like such a wacky conspiracy. Is there any truth to the story that a FOX News reporter reported that the 2nd plane that hit the WTC had no windows? That would give credibility to the remote controlled flying or other aspects of the conspiracy.

To: Don Earl who wrote (7572)	7/30/2004 7:41:31 PM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Don, the reason I posted the videos was to draw attention to two phenomena which had, in fact, been present all along but the significance of which I had not fully grasped. Prior to making the post, I had been watching a TV documentary on the Discovery Channel of the Loizeau family and their work. controlled-demolition.com And, indeed, the documentary was relevant because it explained in detail many aspects of the actual demolition. Interestingly, the Loizeaus were employed to clear the remains of the Murrah building and the TV documentary showed how they did it. The first phenomenon found in a controlled demolition is the enormous amount of pyroclastic dust produced and which arises from the actual burning of the concrete and the reinforcing steel by the explosive charges. This pyroclastic dust is quite distinct from the smoke produced by substances which burn at lower temperatures, eg kerosene. 911research.wtc7.net >>dust clouds, exhibiting the behavior of pyroclastic flows associated with volcanoes, rapidly grew as they fell. Each cloud consumed its tower's top in a few seconds, then continued to descend, remaining centered around on the tower's axis<< The second unique phenomenon is the creation of "squibs" which arise from the charges as the explode in sequence. I then did a search on "squib" and came up with the links which I posted. Interestingly enough, the squibs turned out to be the small, sequenced explosions ("puffs") which I had previously tried to draw peoples' attention to on this thread and which can be seen clearly only in certain views of WTC1 (North Tower). Like you, I am satisfied that the above, plus the aspects which you mentioned, prove that a controlled demolition took place.