SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: NOW who wrote (10029)7/30/2004 2:08:32 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Post by RogerRafter on the FOOL
[I sure wish Heinz was here on this board so that we could have conversations on this stuff a lot easier - mish]

Money is created by banks whenever somebody wants to go into debt and a bank is willing to lend to them. It is created out of thin air, and it can be destroyed just as easily. If you take out a loan, the bank simply creates the money by boosting the value of your account. If you pay back the loan, default on the loan, or if the bank gets in trouble and calls back in the loan, the money disappears. Sounds crazy, but its true. This is the nature of fractional reserve banking and the main reason why the economy goes through periods of boom and bust.

The Federal Reserve can create money also, just by buying something. If the Fed says the money exists, it exists. The Fed's favorite thing to monetize (buy, thus creating money) is US debt. The Fed simply creates the money by buying the notes via repurchase agreements and/or on the open market. The bond seller's bank records the purchase by boosting the value of the seller's account, and the Fed takes over ownership of the treasuries. The Fed can buy anything it wants this way. Greenspan could monetize his lunch if he wants to. He'd get his hot dog, and the vendor's bank would record a deposit in the vendor's account. Sounds crazy, but its true. This is the nature of the Federal Reserve System and why we've had inflation through almost all of the Fed's history.

When the money supply is growing, it finds its way to into corporate accounts as profits and gets spent on capital investments. When the money supply is shrinking, it gets hard to make a profit, and people and companies get very conservative with what they have.

A Fed board member (Bernanke, I believe) recently gave a speech where he said that the Fed could just drop money out of helicopters if it ever wanted to keep the money supply from contracting. Unfortunately it isn't that easy because the private sector has far more impact on the money supply than the Fed does with its direct actions. If the fed did drop money onto the streets, people might take the money out of circulation by depositing it to pay down their credit card balances and home equity loans. If they did, the money supply could contract, not expand. The banks would send the cash nobody wanted back to the Fed and the money created from the customer's debt would evaporate. If the banks also chose to reduce their short term borrowing to reflect the drop in loans outstanding, the net reduction in money created by debt would be more than the added amount that eventually found its way into cash accounts as a result of the helicopter drops.

The Fed has been trying hard to increase the money supply by suppressing short term interest rates and monetizing government debt. The Fed has bought up on average about $1.5 Billion worth of treasuries every week all year. These have mainly been in yields of less than a year, but recently, they've moved out to the 1 to 5 year range. Suppressing short term interest rates with direct intervention in the markets encourages institutions to borrow and expand the money supply, usually by a factor many times greater than the initial monetary injection.

Even with this stimulus, however, the money supply has stopped expanding. M1 has been declining in July. This money stock measure estimates the amount of money people intend to spend by looking at the amount of currency in circulation and the money in people's checking accounts. The decline may just be a blip, but it is more likely that homeowners who no longer are in position to refinance have less money to spend and are cutting back.

For the past year or so, corporations have been taking the easy profits that have been made during the the refinancing and carry-trade boom and paying down their debts, thus offsetting some of the Fed's monetary stimulus. This defensive move makes sense for individual companies, but when a large number of them do it, it causes an economic contraction that hurts all of their profits.

Hedge funds have been create a tremendous amount of money by borrowing on margin. The total created over the past 4 years by hedge fund borrowing is probably over a trillion dollars. When a fund increases its borrowing, they use it to buy some type of stock, bond or other asset and the money circulates until it winds up being saved in some institution's or somebody's money market fund or other type of account.

The expansion of the highly leveraged hedge fund industry has added a tremendous boost the to money supply and the economy, but the repayment of all that debt can do just as much damage. If the market declines much and causes many hedge funds to take a big hit, the overall money supply could decline in a very significant way. If a $2 billion dollar hedge fund, with $2 billion in assets is forced to take $1 billion in losses and only borrow $1 billion in the future, then that is $1 billion that simply evaporates from the money supply.

In July, the four week averages for M2 & M3 have also declined. These numbers mainly measure the amount of money being saved in cash accounts, and grew especially rapidly during the boom and reflation years. Their contraction is a symptom of a decline in profits and a weakening economy. If the economy continues to weaken, and interest rates rise to a level more in line with inflation, the contraction of the money supply could accelerate.

A slowing economy could ease inflation and give and put pressure on the Fed to stop raising rates. However, the cost of production may not drop as much as demand drops, especially if the dollar declines. In a bad economy, companies get defensive and cut production, which only makes the situation worse.

Also, I think we've been witnessing a schizophrenic transformation in Alan Greenspan from his more common "Easy Al" personality to his other personality "Psycho Killer Al." He's now dead set on raising rates and ending the "policy of accommodation" that "Easy Al" was so proud of. Just as Psycho Killer Al did in 1994, I think we can expect him to keep raising rates until their has been sufficient pain in the economy and financial markets to meet his sinister motives.

But seriously, I hope this post does a good job of explaining the nature of our money system and some of the limitations and obstacles faced by the Fed. Based on history, it would be foolish to assume that the Fed can do an effective job of keeping the money supply and economy stable, whether or not their motives are sinister. The rapid economic and monetary expansion of 2003 and early 2004, is almost certain to be followed by a period of significant contraction. The fact that the expansion didn't do much to help the position of workers and consumers suggests that the contraction will be especially hard on those groups when it hits.

Money Supply data here:

federalreserve.gov



To: NOW who wrote (10029)7/30/2004 2:13:35 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
White House lowers deficit estimate to $445 billion
Friday, July 30, 2004 4:25:23 PM

WASHINGTON (AFX) -- The White House lowered Friday its estimate of this year's budget deficit to $445 billion from the $521 billion estimated in February. The deficit, which would be a record in dollar terms, would amount to 3.8 percent of gross domestic product. In 2003, the deficit widened to a record $375 billion or 3.5 percent of GDP. In its mid-session review of the budget, the White House said significantly higher receipts were responsible for much of the improvement in the budget picture. The White House said the deficit would steadily decline by 2009 to $229 billion or 1.5 percent. Critics of the White House had said in February that its estimate was too high. In February, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the deficit would probably hit $477 billion this year.
=============================================================
This is a blatant lie IMO as it does not include the cost of the war in Iraq
That was conveniently deferred from the budget until after the election.

Mish



To: NOW who wrote (10029)7/30/2004 2:18:02 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Chicago purchasing managers index jumps in July -
Friday, July 30, 2004 5:26:29 PM

CHICAGO (AFX) - The Chicago-area economy expanded more than expected in July despite a contraction in the regional job market, according to the monthly survey of corporate purchasing managers released Friday. The Chicago purchasing managers index rose to 64.7 percent in July after 56.4 percent in June and a nearly 16-year high of 68 percent in May. The average of a survey of economists by CBS MarketWatch was for a reading of 59 percent this month. The report is a diffusion index, meaning readings above 50 indicate expansion. July was the 15th straight month of expansion

"This is the third regional survey that shows the manufacturing sector rebounded strongly in July, and the report provides another sign that the soft spot in the economy in June was likely temporary," said Bear Stearns Chief Economist John Ryding

Because much of the region's business centers on industry, some economists believe the Chicago report helps telegraph the often market-sensitive national factory snapshot put out by the Institute for Supply Management. The latest version of that monthly report is due for release Monday. "We look for the national ISM manufacturing index to rise to 62.5 in July from 61.1 in June," said Ryding. The Chicago measure of new orders stood at 68.7 percent vs. 63 percent in June. Production was 69.5 percent vs. 53.9 percent. Order backlogs were at a 10-year high 60.2 percent vs. 53.9 percent

The PMI's prices-paid index showed a slower rate of expansion, at 77.6 percent vs. 84.5 percent in June, which should help ease concerns about accelerating inflation. But the report was not without a blemish

The measure of employment fell below, to a 12-month low 45.6 percent after three straight months of expansion

The job contraction likely resulted from regular summer auto plant closings to retool production lines, said Gina Martin, an economist with Wachovia Securities

"Strength in these figures mirrors the strong numbers recorded in other regional surveys from Philadelphia and the Empire State Federal Reserve districts," said Martin. She agreed with the general assessment of other economists

"The numbers taken together are a welcome sign that the economic weakness that occurred in June was likely a one-month dip," said Martin

In other reports released Friday, the Commerce Department said second-quarter gross domestic product increased at a 3 percent annual rate as consumer spending slowed to 1 percent growth. The University of Michigan's consumer sentiment index increased to 96.7 in late July from 95.6 in June and 96 in early July. Maury Harris, chief economist at UBS, said the Chicago report and expectations that consumers will turn upbeat sentiment into renewed buying has him predicting a faster clip of 4 percent GDP growth in the third quarter

fxstreet.com



To: NOW who wrote (10029)7/30/2004 3:35:54 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
European govt bonds higher as economic data come in weak
Friday, July 30, 2004 4:46:26 PM

LONDON (AFX) - European government bonds rebounded from losses earlier in the week after weaker-than-expected economic data on both sides of the Atlantic

US economic growth in the second quarter came in very disappointing indeed, rising at an annual rate of just 3.0 pct from 4.5 pct in the first quarter and well below expectations

The disappointing headline numbers led to a knee-jerk selling on US Treasuries which spilled over to affect European issues
[knee-jerk selling? I think he means BUYING - mish]

But analysts pointed out that the data was not as bad as it seemed as first-quarter data had been revised up. In addition, the University of Michigan consumer confidence index and Chicago PMI came in strong

Perhaps more importantly, the releases also indicated a pick-up in inflationary pressures not simply related to higher oil prices

"This pick-up in underlying inflation will keep the Fed on its tightening course even with the economy growing slower than expected," said Mike Moran at Daiwa

However, markets appeared to ignore this development. In the euro zone however there were signs that the final inflation estimate for July may be revised downwards

The EU statistics office Eurostat said the euro-zone harmonised index of consumer prices rose a provisional 2.4 pct year-on-year in July, unchanged from its year-on-year increase in June. Final figures are due out on Aug 18

Lehman Brothers economist Sandra Petcov said Eurostat appeared to have made an adjustment for the fact that German laws on summer sales have been deregulated to allow them to start earlier than usual

She said that without this adjustment, the July estimate would have been lower

"Overall, we judge there is a good chance of a downward revision in the final data," she said. Capital Economics economist Julien Seetharamdoo concurred, saying that German and Italian figures released earlier in the week "point to a possible small downward revision when the second estimate, due on Aug 18, is released." He added: "In any event, we expect inflation to fall in the months ahead as the base effects from the rise in oil prices lessen." Earlier, a set of weak French data was released showing that consumer sentiment stayed in the doldrums and joblessness hit a four-year peak

Reports that German unemployment is also rising quickly also helped shore up bond prices

In the UK gilts were also up, reflecting gains seen elsewhere even though UK interest rates are almost universally expected to rise by another quarter point next week. At Yield Change on 1616 GMT pct previous close Sept euribor future (Liffe) 97.850 up 0.01 GERMANY Sept bund future (Eurex) 114.25 up 0.52 4.25 pct Jan 2014 govt bond 100.32 4.21 up 0.42 FRANCE 4.00 pct Oct 2013 govt bond 98.17 4.23 up 0.42 UK Sept gilt future 105.93 up 0.59 5.00 pct 2012 govt bond 99.31 5.09 up 0.62 Dec short sterling future 94.74 up 0.03 ITALY 4.25 pct Jan 2014 govt bond 99.26 4.39 up 0.47 SPAIN 4.45 pct Jul 2014 govt bond 104.07 4.29 up 0.45 NETHERLANDS 4.25 pct Jul 2013 govt bond 95.83 4.27 up 0.43 BELGIUM 4.25 pct Sept 2013 govt bond 99.64 4.29 up 0.44 GREECE 6.50 pct Jan 2014 govt bond 100.70 4.41 up 0.48

fxstreet.com



To: NOW who wrote (10029)7/30/2004 10:56:46 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
U.S. job growth expected to show a July rebound
[the bigger the hype the bigger the fall. I hope expectations get really hiked up - Mish]
Friday, July 30, 2004 7:30:31 PM

WASHINGTON (AFX) -- The U.S. economy hit a speed bump in June, when job growth slowed, retail sales declined and industrial output dipped

Most economists believe the June slowdown was a mere hiccup, while a smaller number of experts warn that the economy has downshifted to a slower pace of growth

Their respective positions will be put to the test on Friday, when the Labor Department reports on the nation's employment status for July. "Our sense is that the June payroll figures were an aberration in an otherwise solid 200,000 or so trend," said Lehman Bros. economists in their weekly research note, referring to growth in nonfarm payrolls

"Businesses are still cautious" because of the November election, terrorism, the stock market and rising inventories, said Irwin Kellner, chief economist for CBS MarketWatch and the Weller professor of economics at Hofstra University. "Even though consumers are confident, the fact is, they aren't spending

The jobs report will be among the first solid data for July. It is the highlight of a busy economic calendar. The tone of the report could help determine how financial markets perform, how fast the Federal Reserve decides to raise interest rates and perhaps even who will sit in the White House for the next four years

Job growth slowed during the second quarter after surging in the winter months. Nonfarm payroll growth peaked at an impressive 353,000 in March, and then dropped to 324,000 in April, 235,000 in May and just 112,000 in June

Economists are forecasting a return to stronger hiring in July. The average forecast of 23 economists surveyed is for payrolls to increase by about 230,000 in July, close to the average gain of 211,000 seen over the first six months of the year. The payroll forecasts range from Kellner's 150,000 to Goldman Sachs' 300,000

Meanwhile, the unemployment rate is expected to remain at 5.6 percent, where it's been for five of the past six months

"We expect a return to healthy payroll employment growth in July, for both technical and fundamental reasons," said Andrew Tilton, an economist for Goldman Sachs. Tilton argues that the fundamentals point to good growth. But technical factors in how the data are put together point to very strong growth -- of 300,000 or so. July payrolls are typically very strong in recoveries, especially when they follow on a decline in June, Tilton said. In addition, the June and July survey weeks were separated by five weeks instead of the typical four weeks. That extra week of growth could translate into a higher number come Friday, Tilton said. A matter of degree A more skeptical view comes from Charles Dumas, an economist for Lombard Street Research, who argues that businesses overhired in the second quarter, resulting negative productivity growth in the quarter. "Resumption of normal productivity growth should make June's 100,000-plus jobs growth typical for the second half of 2004," he said

Avery Shenfeld, economist for CIBC World Markets, is in step with the more widely held view. He's forecasting payroll gains of 233,000

"We share the general sentiment that June's aberrant weakness will be followed up by better numbers for July, particularly for the average workweek," Shenfeld said. The average workweek fell sharply in June to a record low 33.6 hours from 33.8 hours in May. The decline could have been partially due to the national day of mourning for former President Reagan on the Friday of the payroll survey week in June, in which case hours worked should rebound in July

Economists are forecasting a rebound in the workweek to 33.7 hours for July

Hourly wages were also extremely weak in June, rising just 0.1 percent. Adjusted for 3.2 percent inflation, weekly earnings for nonsupervisory workers representing about 80 percent of the work force dropped by 1.4 percent over the past year -- the steepest decline in eight years

The economists surveyed by CBS MarketWatch said average hourly earnings would likely rise 0.2 percent in July

Other data The Institute for Supply Management will release both of its indexes in the coming week. The ISM's manufacturing index is expected to rise to 61.2 percent from 61.1 percent. Any reading over 50 percent is good, and any reading over 60 percent is phenomenal. This index has been above 60 percent for eight straight months. It'll be released on Monday at 10 a.m. Eastern time

And the ISM nonmanufacturing index is expected to rise to 60.9 percent from 59.9 percent. It'll be released Wednesday at 10 a.m

Monthly auto sales also figure in the week's data. Due out Tuesday, July's sales are expected to rebound to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 13.1 million from a six-year low of 12.1 million in June, as automakers revived discounts to speed the movement of vehicles off their lots. Also on tap, personal incomes are expected to show a rise 0.2 percent in June and consumer spending probably fell 0.1 percent. The monthly numbers will be released Tuesday at 8:30 a.m

The nation's factory orders are expected to rise 0.6 percent in June when the data are released on Wednesday at 10 a.m.



To: NOW who wrote (10029)7/30/2004 11:09:56 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
US economy cools amid shopping slowdown
By Andrew Balls

US economic growth slowed more sharply than expected in the second quarter owing to the weakest consumer spending growth for three years as high petrol prices ate into household budgets.


The US economy expanded at a 3 per cent rate in the second quarter, slowing from a revised 4.5 per cent rate in the first quarter, according to the Commerce Department's advance estimate of gross domestic product.

Economists had expected a 3.7 per cent rate of growth in the quarter. Consumer spending grew at 1 per cent, roughly half the consensus forecast, after growing above 4 per cent in the first quarter.

First-quarter GDP was revised upwards from 3.9 per cent to 4.5 per cent, meaning that the overall 3.75 per cent growth rate in the first half was in line with expectations. The Commerce Department warned that its advance estimate is based on incomplete data and is subject to substantial revisions.

While consumer spending was weak in the second quarter, other items in the report were robust. Business fixed investment rose at an 8.9 per cent rate compared with a 4.2 per cent rise in the first quarter, owing to a 10 per cent growth in spending on equipment and spending and 5.2 per cent growth in business spending on structures. Residential fixed investment rose at a strong 15.4 per cent rate and exports grew at a 13.2 per cent rate.

"Businesses are getting a little more flexible in releasing the capital investment dollars which they have been holding," said Bill Zadrozny, chief executive of Siemens Financial Services. "Companies are adding people to their workforces again and they need equipment to support them. It is starting to feed on itself".

In his recent testimony before Congress, Alan Greenspan, Federal Reserve chairman, characterised the slowdown in consumer spending in the second quarter as a "softness which should prove short-lived", owing to high energy prices.

Rising consumer confidence, a still-buoyant housing market, and stronger indications from the May data support the Fed's case that the slowdown in consumer spending in the second quarter will prove temporary. Meanwhile, the Chicago purchasing managers index of business activity, released on Friday, rebounded in July after dipping in June.

Core personal consumption expenditure excluding food and energy - the Fed's preferred measure of inflation - rose at a 1.8 per cent annual rate in the second quarter, down from a 2.1 per cent rate in the first three months of the year. However, the overall PCE index rose at a 3.3 per cent, boosted by energy prices.

Slower than expected growth and an increase in hours worked means that labour market productivity slowed in the quarter.

"We are getting back to a more traditional rise in unit labour costs at a time when other costs, including energy, are rising," said Mickey Levy, chief economist at Bank of America. "This report does not sidetrack the Fed's objective of raising interest rates in a measured way. It does raise the question of how it would deal with a continued moderate growth and rising inflation pressures."

news.ft.com



To: NOW who wrote (10029)7/30/2004 11:52:33 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Latest from Heinz
as usual thanks to ILD
why rising oil is not inflationary
disagreement with Russell on the "synthetic dollar short idea"
Thoughts on M2

Date: Fri Jul 30 2004 18:34
trotsky (frustrated) ID#377387:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
that's what i'd call the 'Argentina alternative'. it can't be ruled out completely - for instance, in the 1930's, even the solvency of the government came to be doubted, and in an intensifying scramble for cash, coupled with huge outflows of gold, the bond market actually crashed not too long after the stock market did, in spite of 10% annualized aggregate price deflation and a sharply shrinking money stock.
but that seems unlikely in the modern day era, on account of domestic demand for treasury debt probably outweighing foreign sales. don't forget, based on their investment criteria, pension funds and the like could easily shift their asset allocation models toward the opposite of what prevailed during the bubble - i.e. go from 70% stocks/30% bonds to 70% bonds/30% stocks. i believe that is exactly what they're going to do eventually.
Date: Fri Jul 30 2004 17:38
trotsky (frustrated@Russell) ID#377387:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
in a nutshell: the huge domestic debt-mountain extant in the US is no reason to be bullish on the dollar's EXTERNAL value.

foreign investors according to the Fed's most recent flow-of-funds report hold a record high USD net long position, over 5 trillion bucks worth of dollar based assets. should the US economy experience a deflationary debt collapse, domestic debtors would scramble to get cash, but foreign creditors would very likely dump the dollar.

therefore the conclusions presented in the 'synthetic short position' theory are wrong.

Date: Fri Jul 30 2004 17:33
trotsky (Raja@gold stocks and deflation) ID#377387:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
actually, no. on this point i disagree with e.g. Prechter, since gold's purchasing power tends to increase during deflationary times ( remember, it is money ) , even though it may not rise a lot in nominal terms.
consequently, gold stocks should see improving margins during such a period and attract funds. in fact, in the modern-day policy making era it's a little more complex than that, since evidence of deflation results in the market anticipating INflationary central bank intervention in order to stem it. so you have a sort of back and forth between various groups of market participants that look to gold for different reasons.

Date: Fri Jul 30 2004 15:52
trotsky (Gspot@money supply) ID#377387:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
please note: the year-on-year growth of M2 has just hit a fresh 10-year low. so, present money supply growth is not supportive of 'reflation' ideas. however, it supports the idea that economic growth in the US is about to weaken sharply, which in turn will entice the Fed to attempt to goose money supply growth once again and abandon its 'baby step' rate hikes campaign.

Date: Fri Jul 30 2004 15:39
trotsky (Earl Grey@oil & bonds) ID#377387:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
as i have frequently pointed out, this is not the 1970's. those expecting a replay will imo be disappointed. we're in a deflationary era, and in a deflationary era, rising oil prices SUPPORT bonds, since they promise a slowdown in economic growth and credit expansion.