SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (51952)8/1/2004 9:38:35 PM
From: energyplay  Respond to of 74559
 
Re: Red light running - the need for this in San Francisco is enormuous. Not to metion Boston.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (51952)8/2/2004 3:05:16 AM
From: Taikun  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hi Jay,

In Japan the courts have ruled that traffic camera photos can only be used if the vehicle is occupied by a single driver, other than that it is an invasion of privacy (businessmen with their mistresses, politicians getting bribes, yakuza shaking down someone) and the photos are to be destroyed.

Is this a problem elsewhere? I know the cameras are still in place in Vancouver, Canada intersections but there is no film in them and no more citations come from any remote cameras or even remote radar.

Not sure of the official legal status on this stuff though. Just what I read in the Vancouver paper.

Hmmm...

T



To: TobagoJack who wrote (51952)8/2/2004 10:25:34 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
does IPIX also do this?
finance.yahoo.com



To: TobagoJack who wrote (51952)8/2/2004 12:39:45 PM
From: pezz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
Thanx for the China update .

<<why do you feel the need to make such bets?>>

OK I exaggerated a bit.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (51952)8/4/2004 6:59:19 PM
From: pezz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
<<why do you feel the need to make such bets?>>

becuz of days like this.

finance.yahoo.com