Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (142273)	8/2/2004 2:31:18 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I don't agree with Moore, in fact, I think he's extremely dishonest, but just wanted to point out that the big name professional reviewers all say that the film is flawed and one-sided, although they also think it's brilliant. It's clearly intended to influence the upcoming Presidential election. Its sell-by date is ticking. If you just detach from the 2004 election and think of it as a polemic, an expression of a certain point of view, then it's much easier to judge on its merits. I don't think it will hold up well, but he accomplishes what he set out to accomplish, express his outrage that an idiot like Bush is in the White House and half the country thinks that's a good thing.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (142273)	8/2/2004 4:17:31 AM
From: Dr. Id	Respond to of 281500

So given all of your discussion of the film, I take it that you've seen Fahrenheit 9-11?