SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: orkrious who wrote (10095)8/2/2004 9:14:52 AM
From: Wyätt Gwyön  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
the idea of inexhaustible oil is promoted by what Colin Campbell calls the "flat-earth economists". they think it is just a function of price, and since there is always some residue left somewhere, it's just a matter of how much it will cost.

but oil is not like diamonds or gold, which can be thought of in some sense as money; oil is produced, ultimately, because it is energy. so there is an absolute energy budget which supercedes economics. namely, if the process of oil production consumes more energy than the produced oil itself contains, you're SOL. there is some long acronymn for this, along the lines of "net energy returned for energy invested".

it is sort of like saying somebody would invent a perpetual motion machine if only the price were high enough.



To: orkrious who wrote (10095)8/2/2004 10:54:01 AM
From: zonder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Re "infinite oil" - Wired magazine had an article on this guy and his theory a couple of years ago:

wired.com

He is a respected scientist but has not been always right (see his support for "steady state universe") and his "infinite oil" theory is nowhere near widely accepted.

The link above is from 2000 and contains an interview with Gold in his 90s.