Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wayners who wrote (39763)	8/2/2004 6:40:59 PM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

They wouldn't be charged with anything. From my understanding when someone like junior missed as much time as he did the military was supposed to report them to their draft board as being eligible for the draft. In other words they told the board to reclassify them 1-A. If this was never done in junior's case I would like to know why. The answer is somewhere in the records junior has kept the public from viewing.

To: Wayners who wrote (39763)	8/2/2004 6:45:52 PM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Why didn't you answer my main question... it was - What is a 'non-locatee'? They wouldn't be charged with anything. The person is administratively separated from the service, gets a negative final evaluation or OER or FITREP and thats the end of it. Would the military contact their draft board? For what? Why wasn't this done? By negative final evaluation do you mean a less than honorable discharge? Almost all of the people who missed as much duty as junior got a less than honorable discharge. Of course their daddy wasn't poppy.