Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (142349)	8/2/2004 6:29:33 PM
From: GST	Respond to of 281500

If you think of Nadine as the self-appointed spokesperson for the Israeli government her post make perfect sense.

To: Suma who wrote (142349)	8/4/2004 8:38:06 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

his is exactly the name calling disingenuous kind of post that discredits the messenger. What IF, just what IF Fisk were telling the truth. What IF he were right Even a broken clock is right twice a day and even a proven liar may occasionally utter the truth. Nonetheless, sensible people look for their facts from other sources than proven liars. And if you don't think Fisk is a proven liar, go back and read what he had to say about "the Massacre of Jenin" a supposedly occurrence that he reported as if he were an eyewitness when he was not, and never took a single word of it back when it was all proved a lie. Incidentally, a colleague of his at the The Independent, Phil Reeves, did have the grace to take his "massacre of Jenin" reports back. But Fisk did not. He never does when reports prove false, which they do a very large percent of the time. Accuracy is just not his thing.