Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : John Kerry for President? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (562)	8/3/2004 9:30:38 AM
From: MrLucky	Respond to of 3515

So you would have Bush ignore the threat? Yes or No?

To: American Spirit who wrote (562)	8/3/2004 9:32:47 AM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 3515

It was enough for the democrat Gov of NJ . AS sdhould he resign? Is he working with Bush on this?

To: American Spirit who wrote (562)	8/4/2004 10:38:46 AM
From: JakeStraw	Respond to of 3515

DeLay Mocks Work-Shirking Kerry Tuesday, Aug. 3, 2004 We weren't the only ones to note the hilarious hypocrisy when Sen. John Kerry, who refuses to take himself off the taxpayers' dole even though he has missed more than three-fourths of the votes this year, called yesterday for President Bush to convene a special session of Congress. "That's pretty tough talk from a guy who has fewer days at work this year than he has houses," stated House Majority Leader Tom DeLay. "He's not been around here during our regular session; what makes anyone think he'll be here for a special session?" Story Continues Below Nor were we the only ones to think that in the unlikely event Kerry would show his face at work if a session were called, America would be better off without his rare appearance. In the 1980s and '90s, "He voted 38 times to cut defense spending, against higher pay for our troops, and proposed a $45 billion cut in intelligence spending," noted DeLay, R-Texas. "Maybe we're better off when he's vacationing than actually working after all." Is it too early for the Massachusetts Democrat to flip-flop on his claim during his convention speech that he wanted voters to judge him on his record?