Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (7602)	8/3/2004 8:09:20 AM
From: LPS5	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

JFK's motorcade was ambushed in Dallas on Nov 23, 1964 and the President was assassinated[.] Impossible. LPS5

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (7602)	8/3/2004 8:11:55 AM
From: Rock_nj	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

At that point, the 911 conspirators were left with two separate story lines: the hijacked airliners that were duly "intercepted" by the USAF, and the "simultaneous" bombings in NY and Washington.... It was just a matter of meshing it all together... All Cheney had to do was to round off the corners so as to squeeze the peg of the hijacked airliners into the round hole of the bombing of NY/Wash. But then, what other story/scenario could have reasonably been told to the American people? The hijacked airliners HAD TO have been used as suicide flying bombs..... QED Conspiracy theories are interesting to consider, but they have to be supported by some evidence. The evidence in the case of the WTC points overwhelmingly to the fact that aircraft were flown into the buildings. The event was captured by numerous video recording devices and tens of thousands of eye witnesses, including people I know personally. So, your "conspiracy" doesn't hold any weight. Perhaps a case could be made that a 767 was not flown into the Pentagon on 9/11/01. Hardly anyone witnessed it, there are no clear images, and the debris and damage seem suspect. I could see an alternative explanation being taken seriously in this case, like a missle or military jet hit the Pentagon. But, please provide some supporting evidence for your "theory" that the WTC was not hit by airplanes, witnessed by 10,000s/captured by many video devices, on that fateful day. Without any supporting evidence or explanation, how can we take your "theory" seriously.