Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (40036)	8/3/2004 2:47:04 PM
From: cirrus	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

It would have made a lot more sense to have left Saddam in power. Nothing happened central Iraq without his approval (the north was friendly Kurd controlled and the South was Shiite controlled) and he wasn't about to risk his power by harboring terrorists Taliban-syle. The 9/11 Commission report was clear. Saddam had nothing to do with ANY, repeat ANY terrorist activity against the United States. Jeepers... terrorists lived and trained in Florida for months before 9/11... why didn't we invade Florida? Why not invade Saudi Arabia, home to 17 of the 19 hijackers, the money supporting them and the religious schools that promote Wahabi extremism? Islamic terrorists couldn't resist the temptation to take on the US military