Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Technology Stocks & Market Talk With Don Wolanchuk -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (17367)	8/4/2004 11:50:00 AM
From: sandeep	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 207138

Don't you think that he needs to be more optimistic? He just can't project it? I disagree with your comments about other presidents. Sept 11th changed Bush - for the better. I have every confidence that any of the last 10 presidents would have behaved the same way. Carter is the only one I am not sure about... And if I were to criticize Bush on war of terror, I would say that send 50K troops into Afghanistan/Pakistan and get Osama, send 20K troops into Iraq and Get Zarqavi. It is ABOUT TIME.

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (17367)	8/5/2004 1:11:19 PM
From: HULA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 207138

Put Iraq issue aside... There's one big difference between Bush and Clinton's war on terror. Bush skillfully uses diplomatic channel to get Pakistan joining us to fight against terrorists, what had Clinton done with Pakistan in 8 years? Pakistan's Intelligent Agency used to have closed tie with Taliban while Maiden Albright was dancing Macarena at UN floor. IMO, Knowing those culture of back-door dealing, the disclosure of Pakistan's smuggling ring by its nuclear godfather scientist is very significant.