SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: cirrus who wrote (40470)8/5/2004 10:24:15 AM
From: stockman_scottRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
MITCH ALBOM: Don't tell us, we'll tell you who's a leader
_________________________

BY MITCH ALBOM
DETROIT FREE PRESS COLUMNIST
July 11, 2004
freep.com

I always laugh when politicians tell voters who is "fit to lead." It reminds me of a cat telling mice where they should hide.

Last week, John Kerry told us John Edwards, his new vice presidential candidate, was fit to lead, even though earlier this year he criticized Edwards, saying the White House "was no place for on-the-job training."

Edwards, for his part, told groups of cheering fans that his new boss was fit to lead, even though a few months ago, Edwards was doing his best to knock Kerry out of the race.

President George W. Bush, when asked to compare Edwards to his vice president, Dick Cheney, responded by setting his jaw and quipping, "Dick Cheney can be president."

To which pundits immediately replied, "We thought Dick Cheney was president."

Let's face it. When it comes to the White House, who really knows what it takes to be a good president -- let alone a good vice president? Bush's father once joked that the vice president was the man who got sent to funerals overseas. Yet people accuse the current vice president of creating funerals overseas.

Which is it?

A who's who in the race
The fact is, there is no formula for the White House. And the people running for that office should show enough respect to, please, finally, stop trying to define it for us.

After all, does Bush really want to tell people that Edwards' one term as senator isn't enough to warrant a vice presidential nod? Bush himself had only five total years in politics before he became president. Before that, Bush had been a failed businessman and a bit of a runabout, bailed out by his father's connections numerous times.

Is that really the profile of a leader?

Conversely, too much experience doesn't seem to be a good thing, either. Cheney certainly put his time into public office. He served as Defense secretary, White House chief of staff and Wyoming congressman. But his critics say his secrecy, cronyism and Cold War approach are the kind of thinking that needs to be expelled.

Too much experience? Or too little?

Which is it?

Make up your mind.

Looks can be deceiving
John Kerry has been in politics for a quarter of a century. What has that gotten him? Critics rifle through his voting record and pluck it apart, using his years on the job to define him as a hypocrite (as if none of us has ever changed our mind on anything in 25 years).

And then there's the military factor. Kerry, who makes such a big deal of his admirable Vietnam days, chooses a vice presidential candidate with no time in the military. Meanwhile, Bush and Cheney, who claim Democrats don't know how to lead a war, have zero years of war experience between them. So do you need to have served, or don't you?

What about being "a man of the people"? Bush walks and talks like a Texas farmhand, but he's a rich kid from Yale. Kerry likes to tell you he plays hockey, but he's blue blood all the way. Cheney points out that Edwards is a rich trial lawyer, a loathsome profession. But Edwards will claim he got rich by sticking it to loathsome, insensitive corporations, like the one Cheney used to run.

History shows that there is no perfect footprint here. John F. Kennedy had relatively little experience, yet people adored him. Richard Nixon had a pedigree a mile long, yet many hated him. Ronald Reagan had bad movies in his past, yet he got elected twice. The elder Bush, a Washington insider, couldn't hold off a Washington outsider named Clinton.

When Al Gore ran against him in 2000, George W. Bush claimed it was time for a change. With Kerry running against him, Bush says stick with experience. Kerry's rival is now his partner. Edwards' rival is now his boss. Cheney does too much. Edwards does too little. With all this confusion, it's almost a relief that, in the end, the November election will, as always, come down to that one essential American quality:

Who looks best on TV?

_____________________________

Contact MITCH ALBOM at 313-223-4581 or albom@freepress.com. "The Mitch Albom Show" is 3-6 weekdays and "Monday Sports Albom" 7-8 p.m. Mondays on WJR-AM (760).

Copyright © 2004 Detroit Free Press Inc.



To: cirrus who wrote (40470)8/5/2004 10:45:28 AM
From: WaynersRespond to of 81568
 
There is a major contradiction in events. The Citation says the VC had a rocket in the chamber behind the shack. The Kerry website doesn't mention it. Its important becaused if the VC was unarmed behind behind the hooch and wounded by the M60 .308 cal MG, then Kerry applying the "Coup De Grace" killing him with his sidearm point blank was a war crime. Now look at the following link showing a B40 rocket and how large it and the rocket is.
geocities.com

The report would have you believe this VC fired a B40 rocket, was hit by .308 cal MG in the leg no less, ran (how?) behind a hooch with the B40 still in tow. No way. Kerry shot and killed a wounded unarmed man point blank. Thats an illegal killing. And there clearly was no enemy postion there, just a single VC otherwise Kerry would have been cut down by small arms fire on the shore.

It says there is an enemy position there, but it seems it was one man with a single B-40 rocket, which was fired at the boat, leaving the launcher empty. So how can there be a round in the chamber? How does killing a guy with an empty rocket launcher who is wounded in the face of no other enemy fire warrant a silver star exactly? Like I said, its a fraud. To legitimately get a SS you have to go above the call of duty. This incident doesn't qualify.

Silver Star Citation.

Arriving at the area, Lieutenant (junior grade) KERRY's craft received a B-40 rocket close aboard. Once again Lieutenant (junior grade) KERRY ordered his units to charge the enemy positions and summoned Patrol Craft Fast 43 to the area to provide additional firepower. Patrol Craft Fast 94 then beached in the center of the enemy positions and an enemy soldier sprang up from his position not ten feet from Patrol Craft Fast 94 and fled. Without hesitation Lieutenant (junior grade) KERRY leaped ashore, pursued the man behind a hootch and killed him, capturing a B-40 rocket launcher with a round in the chamber.

Kerry website version of events:

Returning from the site, a B-40 rocket exploded close to PCF94, blowing out one of the windows. Kerry again ordered the units to turn into the fire and charge the ambush site. PCF 94 landed in the center of ambush and a man jumped up holding a B-40 rocket launcher and started to run. The forward M-60 gunner on PCF94 wounded him in the leg as Kerry jumped off the boat and chased him inland behind a hooch and shot him. Marines swept the area, and received fire from snipers and small arms that was suppressed with the assistance of mortars and gunfire from the swiftboats. The landing parties found vast stores of rice, ammunition and clothing. The boats were fired on one additional time as they were heading back down the river. The site of the second ambush was believed to be a major Viet Cong supply point. Kerry received the Silver Star for this operation.