To: Cooters who wrote (135119 ) 8/5/2004 10:27:46 AM From: Jim Mullens Respond to of 152472 Cooters, Re: “The new holy war is in the 802.20 committee, Intel is more or less saying they don't think anything will even come out of it. To recap, QCOM and other 3G suppliers are up against the newcomers like Flarion. “ It appears that Intel (and others) are perhaps attempting to pressure the various IP interests (Navini, ArrayComm and Flarion) to lower their demands. I recall last year at the Gilder Telecosm Intel was highly promoting “mobile WiMAX” as a strong competitor / slayer of 3G (CDMA/ WCDMA). Dr. Paul and Paul Otellini (Intel- COO) had a very heated exchange on this issue. It’s my understanding that WiMax (802.16e) has a mobility feature, however I’m not quite sure exactly what the specs of that are, and when and if they’ll be realized. Some conflicting interpretations of “mobile WiMAX” from other articles- Snips- 1- Not everyone is buying that argument, though. "The bottom line is they're very similar," said Ed Rerisi, director of research at Allied Business Intelligence (ABI). "They do have some minor differences, but they both are aimed to serve similar users." Essentially, 802.16e is looking at the mobile user walking around with a PDA or laptop, while 802.20 will address high-speed mobility issues, he said. One key difference will be the manner in which the two are deployed. "Our assumption is that the carriers are going to deploy .16e in their existing [.16a] footprint as opposed to deploying a more widespread footprint, like a cellular network, for example," said Rerisi. "802.20 is looking at more ubiquitous coverage ... and that will require a larger footprint." 2. The 802.16e project authorization request specifies only that it will "support subscriber stations moving at vehicular speeds"; Kiernan said the group has achieved speeds of 120 to 150 kilometers per hour (75 to 93 miles per hour) in simulations.