SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: russwinter who wrote (10217)8/6/2004 9:08:01 AM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116555
 
Well I bought eurodollar calls yesterday and have been riding out my entire euribor call position.

I was forced out of my short eurodollar puts and as of right now I can say there is almost no chance of march 97's finishing ITM.

Those job numbers back in April and May were huge lies IMO

Mish



To: russwinter who wrote (10217)8/6/2004 9:14:08 AM
From: loantech  Respond to of 116555
 
<Diagnosis: Weak economy, wage inflation joins commodity inflation. If the USD weakens here, this will get even worse>

And GOLD up very nicely. <g>



To: russwinter who wrote (10217)8/6/2004 9:18:42 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
U.S. July job growth slows to 32,000 -
Friday, August 6, 2004 1:07:47 PM

WASHINGTON (AFX) -The U.S. economy added 32,000 nonfarm payroll jobs in July as hiring slowed for the fourth straight month, the Labor Department reported Friday

It was the slowest job growth of the year

Economists were expecting much stronger payroll growth of about 235,000 in July, according to a survey conducted by CBS MarketWatch. Payroll growth in May and June was revised lower by a cumulative 61,000, showing the job market is weaker than commonly thought. June was revised to 78,000 from 112,000 while May was revised down to 208,000 from 235,000, according to the survey of 400,000 business establishments. "A terribly disappointing report," said Joshua Shapiro, chief economist for MFR

Treasurys rallied on the report. The yield on the 10-year Treasury plunged to 4.18 percent. U.S. stock futures dropped and European stocks fell. The dollar fell. Meanwhile, a separate survey of 60,000 households showed the unemployment rate fell to 5.5 percent from 5.6 percent as 629,000 more adults were employed. Economists had expected the jobless rate to remain steady

The household survey showed much greater strength in the job market than did the more-accepted survey of business establishments. The July report could reignite the debate about which survey is more accurate. Most economists prefer the establishment survey

The report could have huge implications in financial markets, as well as on the campaign trail. The Federal Open Market Committee is widely expected to raise interest rates by a quarter percentage point to 1.5 percent at its meeting on Tuesday, but the weakening job market could slow the pace of rate hikes later in the year if conditions don't improve

Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan said last month he believed June's weakness was just a temporary soft patch. President Bush has been touting his successes as an economic leader, while challenger John Kerry has argued that the benefits of growth have not been widely distributed

In July, hiring slowed across most industries. Among 278 industries, 49.5 percent were adding jobs in July, down from 60.1 percent in June and the lowest percentage of the year

Manufacturing was an area of strength, with 54.2 percent of industries adding workers in July

Goods-producing industries added 18,000 including 10,000 in manufacturing. Construction firms added 4,000

Services-producing industries added 14,000 jobs, the lowest since August 2003. Retail lost 19,000 jobs. Financial services lost 23,000

Job growth was seen in professional and business services, which grew by 42,000 including 5,000 temporary help jobs. Health care and education added 20,000 jobs

Government employment was flat

The average workweek lengthened by a tenth of an hour to 33.7 hours from the record low 33.6 hours. Total hours worked in the economy increased by 0.3 percent after falling by 0.5 percent in June

Average hourly earnings of nonsupervisory workers increased 5 cents, or 0.3 percent, to $15.70. Hourly earnings are up 1.9 percent in the past year. Average weekly earnings increased by $3.25 to $529.09

The separate household survey saw employment soar by 629,000 in July, while the labor force expanded by 577,000. Unemployment fell by 52,000 to 8.2 million. The employment participation rate rose to 62.5 percent from 62.3 percent

The unemployment rate fell for most demographic groups. For whites, the jobless rate was 4.8 percent. For blacks, the jobless rate rose by 0.8 percentage points to 10.9 percent. For teenagers, the jobless rate was 17.6 percent

Long-term unemployment dropped significantly. Of the 8.2 million classified as unemployed, 20.4 percent had been out of work longer than 27 weeks, down from 21.6 percent in June. The average duration of unemployment fell to 18.6 weeks from 19.9 weeks, with the median duration fell to 8.9 weeks from 10.8 weeks

fxstreet.com



To: russwinter who wrote (10217)8/6/2004 9:20:07 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--U.S. employers hired workers at the slowest pace in eight months in July, contradicting the assertions of U.S. economic policymakers that the job market is improving and adding to fears the the economic recovery may be fizzling.
Non-farm business payrolls grew by a net 32,000 last month, the smallest increase since December, the Labor Department said Friday. The department also said employers created 61,000 fewer more jobs in May and June than was first estimated.

Still, the U.S. unemployment rate dropped to its lowest level in nearly three years, falling a tenth of a percentage point to 5.5%. That marked the lowest level since October 2001.

The numbers broadly surprised Wall Street. The average forecast of economists surveyed by Dow Jones Newswires and CNBC had called for an increase of 215,000 jobs and a 5.6% unemployment rate in July.

U.S. economic growth slowed sharply in the spring as high energy prices frightened consumers into cutting expenditures. The gross domestic product expanded 3% from April through June, down from a 4.5% rate in the previous three months. In June, employers hired workers at a lackluster pace for the first time in four months.

But Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan told Congress last month the slowdown wasn't a sign of a fizzling economic recovery. "While there has been weakness in June...I might say that July seems to be somewhat better, even though we are going through a soft patch," Greenspan told the Senate Banking Committee on July 20. "There is no real underlying evidence of any cumulative weakness here." The White House expressed similar optimism.

Wall Street, as a result, reached the conclusion that the Fed would persist with the campaign of interest-rate increases it began in June to keep inflation under wraps. The central bank, whose monetary policy committee next meets on Tuesday, had been expected to raise the funds rate by a quarter percentage point at each of the next four meetings of the committee.

The Labor Department's report Friday, however, belied Greenspan's optimism and could rekindle an expectation on Wall Street that the central bank will opt not to raise interest rates next week.

The department revised its estimates of job growth for May and June, saying employers added 208,000 jobs in May and 78,000 in June. Previous estimates had shown a 235,000 increase in May and a 112,000 increase in June.

The report showed that all of the growth in non-farm jobs last month occurred in the private sector. The government added no jobs.

The manufacturing industry added 10,000 jobs, rebounding after a mild decline in June. The construction industry added 4,000 jobs, up from 3,000 in June. The service-producing industry added 14,000 jobs as a 42,000 increase in professional-and-business-services jobs offset a 19,000 decline in retail-trade jobs.

The jobs growth coincided with a minuscule increase in average hourly earnings, which rose five cents to $15.70 in July. The year-on year increase was 1.9%. The average work week rose six minutes to 33.7 hours.



To: russwinter who wrote (10217)8/6/2004 9:26:41 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION: JULY 2004
bls.gov

Nonfarm employment was little changed (+32,000) in July, and the unemployment rate was essentially unchanged at 5.5 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Employment levels in most of the major industry sectors were little changed over the month.

Unemployment (Household Survey Data)

Both the number of unemployed persons, 8.2 million, and the unemployment rate, 5.5 percent, were essentially unchanged in July. The unemployment rate has shown little movement since December 2003. The jobless rates for the major worker groups--adult men (4.9 percent), adult women (4.9 percent), teenagers (17.6 percent), whites (4.8 percent), blacks (10.9 percent), and Hispanics or Latinos (6.8 percent)--also were little changed over the month. The unemploy- ment rate for Asians was 4.3 percent in July, not seasonally adjusted. (See tables A-1, A-2, and A-3.)

Total Employment and the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

Total employment rose by 629,000 to 139.7 million in July, and the employ- ment population ratio--the proportion of the population age 16 and over with jobs--increased to 62.5 percent. The civilian labor force also increased over the month, rising by 577,000 to 147.9 million, and the labor force participa- tion rate rose to 66.2 percent. (See table A-1.)

Persons Not in the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

The number of persons who were marginally attached to the labor force was 1.6 million in July, the same as a year earlier. (Data are not seasonally
adjusted.) These individuals wanted and were available to work and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months. They were not counted as unemployed, however, because they did not actively search for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. There were 504,000 discouraged workers in July, little changed from a year earlier. Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, were not currently looking for work specifically because they believed no jobs were available for them. The other 1.1 million marginally attached had not searched for work for reasons such as school or family responsibilities. (See table
A-13.)



To: russwinter who wrote (10217)8/6/2004 9:29:08 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
BLS: Commissioners Statement bls.gov

The unemployment rate was essentially unchanged at 5.5 percent in July, and nonfarm payroll employment was little changed (+32,000). Since August 2003, nonfarm payroll employment has risen by 1.5 million; about three-fifths of this growth occurred during March, April, and May of this year. In July, employment gains in health care and social assistance and in professional and business services were partly offset by a decline in finance and insurance.

Health care and social assistance added 20,000 jobs in July; employment in the industry has risen by 292,000 over the year. Over the month, job growth continued in ambulatory health care services, hospitals, and child day care services.

Employment continued to trend up in professional and business services (+42,000) in July. This sector has added 622,000 jobs since its most recent low in March 2003. Employment in temporary help, which provides workers to other industries, has changed little since May. Temporary help employment had increased by 293,000 from April 2003 through May 2004.

Employment in finance and insurance decreased by 25,000
in July, with the largest job loss (-16,000) in credit intermediation. The decline in credit intermediation, an industry that includes mortgage brokerages, largely offset the employment gain of 21,000 during the first half of 2004. Security and commodity brokerages also shed jobs over the month.

In the goods-producing sector, manufacturing employment edged up in July (+10,000), after showing no movement in June (-1,000, as revised). The sector has added 91,000 jobs since January, with virtually all of the gain in durable goods manufacturing. Over the month, employment grew in machinery, computer and electronic products, and furniture. Employment in transportation equipment fell in July (-21,000), due to larger-than-usual shutdowns in auto and parts plants for annual retooling. The factory workweek edged up by 0.1 hour to 40.9 hours and factory overtime, at 4.6 hours, was unchanged.

Mining employment continued to trend up in July. Since April 2003, the industry has added 29,000 jobs. In July, construction employment was flat for the second month in a row, after adding an average of 18,000 jobs per month from March 2003 through May 2004.

Average hourly earnings for private production or nonsupervisory workers rose by 5 cents over the month, following a 2-cent increase in June. Over the year, average hourly earnings grew by 1.9 percent.

Turning now to information from our survey of
households, the unemployment rate and the number of
unemployed persons were essentially unchanged in July, at
5.5 percent and 8.2 million, respectively. After declining during the second half of 2003, the jobless rate has shown little movement since December. The labor force participation rate rose in July to 66.2 percent.

The trend in employment growth depicted by our
household and establishment surveys had been roughly similar for over a year but the employment series from the two surveys showed a large divergence in July. As measured by the household survey, employment rose by 629,000 over the month, compared with a change of 32,000, as measured by the establishment survey. Even after adjusting household survey employment to make it conceptually similar to the establishment survey measure, household survey employment increased by 434,000 in July.

The estimate of over-the-month change in employment
from the establishment survey is less volatile than that
from the household survey for a variety of reasons. The establishment survey has a much larger sample. Moreover, the household survey is not designed to optimize the measurement of month-to-month employment change, but rather to optimize the accuracy of the unemployment rate--something that cannot be measured from the establishment survey.

To put this month's change in household survey
employment in context, there have been 14 other months over
the past 10 years when the over-the-month change was nearly 600,000 or more. (This figure is based on data as originally published, and omits months when there were breaks in data comparability.) In contrast, the payroll survey registered only one over-the-month change greater than 500,000 during the same time period, and that movement was due to an unusual weather event in the prior month (again using data as originally published). Not surprisingly, unusually large over-the-month movements in household survey employment often result in substantial discrepancies between the two surveys' measures of employment change in those months.

In recent years, BLS has studied the differences in employment trends as measured by our household and establishment surveys. This information is summarized on our Web site at bls.gov.
We will continue our research and issue additional findings
as appropriate. As always, we recommend that users avoid focusing too much on any single month's estimates when examining labor market developments.

In summary, the unemployment rate was essentially unchanged in July, at 5.5 percent, although it was down substantially from a year earlier. Nonfarm payroll employment was little changed at 131.3 million in July and has risen by 1.5 million since August 2003.



To: russwinter who wrote (10217)8/6/2004 10:09:39 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Kerry to unveil energy plan -
Friday, August 6, 2004 1:53:16 PM
afxpress.com

WASHINGTON (AFX) -- As oil prices climb to record highs, Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry hopes to slide into the White House with a plan to lower energy bills by spending $20 billion over the next decade on the development of more environmentally friendly fuels

"Kerry and (vice presidential nominee John) Edwards understand that soaring energy costs are burdening middle-class families and businesses and that our dependence on Middle East oil is putting our national security at risk," a fact sheet provided by the Kerry-Edwards campaign said

Kerry is expected to formally outline his plan in a speech in Kansas City, Mo., on Friday. The speech comes a day after crude futures topped $44 per barrel and analysts are talking about prices as high as $50 per barrel

"Kerry and Edwards will harness the full force of American ingenuity to create the energy of the future and make America independent of Middle East oil," the campaign said

The speech also comes on the same day the Labor Department announced the economy added just 32,000 nonfarm payroll jobs in July, as hiring slowed for the fourth straight month. It's the slowest job growth of the year and well below expectations

Kerry and Edwards want to use government oil and gas royalties to create an "Energy Security and Conservation Trust Fund" that the campaign said would allow development of "new clean fuels and technologies for our future." And the campaign says Kerry would use international diplomacy to pressure U.S. allies to increase oil production in the near-term "to rein in out-of-control gas prices." Kerry is hoping to use pocketbook issues to show a contrasting policy with President Bush on security issues in the Middle East and Iraq. The campaign said Kerry would "engage in aggressive, effective diplomacy that will reduce tension in the region and reduce the 'risk premium' for oil." Kerry and Edwards accused the Bush administration of being too lax in its oversight of the consolidation of the petrochemical industry

"Kerry and Edwards believe the (Federal Trade Commission) needs to be more cautious about approving energy sector mergers in order to protect consumers," the campaign said, noting that the FTC has approved 33 mergers valued at $19.5 billion in the three years since Bush has been in office

President Bush blames Senate Democrats, including Kerry, for blocking his energy legislation in Congress, which includes a controversial provision to drill for oil for the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska

fxstreet.com



To: russwinter who wrote (10217)8/6/2004 10:21:36 AM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
FNM is getting killed today
No it is not reflected in the price but every time there is a mammoth move in treasuries FNM has to re-adjust

Furthermore John Succo at Minyanville thinks as do I that FNM was primarily hedged for rising yields. Now they had to take a massive hit on that today unless Greenspan gave them advance numbers.

Now they will be positioning for more refis.
Thing is, if home prices stall there will not be more refis regardless of how low we go.

FNM was screwed today and the idiots go out and buy FNM.
FNM lost a fortune today.
How long can they go without disclosing their book?
Why do idiots keep buying this stock?

Mish



To: russwinter who wrote (10217)8/6/2004 10:52:26 AM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Deflation and Depression: Where's the Link?
mises.org



To: russwinter who wrote (10217)8/6/2004 10:57:04 AM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Treasuries
went up lock limit this AM



To: russwinter who wrote (10217)8/6/2004 2:25:20 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
we import productivity from Asian outsourcing
if outsourcing is interrupted, productivity will slow
but even that stat is corrupted by IT hedonics

I disagree on the meaning of 0.3% wage increase
that is small in the scheme of things
under 4% annualized !!!

just added justification to outsource on a cost basis
and lay off big numbers more

a firm which cannot pay its workers much more will lay them off
since their profit margins are shrinking
part of your crack-up boom scenario

you cannot ignore a big piece of your own argument, Russ

if wages rise by 7% annually, I am on your side
only if final product demand prices are permitted to rise and support continued wage gains
pricing power lies in China's hands
they will enforce it
so far, only a trickle on that price bench so far

/ jim